[Bug 235787] ixgbe no carrier problem - TX(7) desc avail = 2048, pidx = 0

2019-11-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235787 dar...@dons.net.au changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dar...@dons.net.au --- Comment

SRv6 in FreeBSD

2019-11-24 Thread madhava gaikwad via freebsd-net
Hello Experts, I want to know if there is any effort/planning going on to implement Segment Routing (RFC 8402 https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8402). I see Linux supporting it. Wondering if there is something planned on FreeBSD too.My app runs on FreeBSD and I have a use case to share information

[Bug 230807] if_alc.ko driver not working for Killer Networking E2200

2019-11-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230807 Mark Millard changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marklmi26-f...@yahoo.com --- Commen

Problem reports for n...@freebsd.org that need special attention

2019-11-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
To view an individual PR, use: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users, which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and ob

Re: Several hosts behind a caching resolver

2019-11-24 Thread Victor Sudakov
Eugene Grosbein wrote: > 24.11.2019 23:02, Victor Sudakov wrote: > > > If there are multiple recursive queries for MS domains only, do you think > > the operator of Resolver B can tell if there are 10 or 100 MS clients > > behind Resolver A? > > I guess so, because different Windows versions may

Re: Several hosts behind a caching resolver

2019-11-24 Thread Eugene Grosbein
24.11.2019 23:02, Victor Sudakov wrote: > If there are multiple recursive queries for MS domains only, do you think > the operator of Resolver B can tell if there are 10 or 100 MS clients > behind Resolver A? I guess so, because different Windows versions may behave differently (including errat

Re: Several hosts behind a caching resolver

2019-11-24 Thread Victor Sudakov
Eugene Grosbein wrote: > > > > Several hosts of the local network use a FreeBSD server with BIND or > > local-unbound as a caching resolver. Let's call it "Resolver A." > > Resolver A forwards all queries to another resolver, e.g. 8.8.8.8 or > > some other, let's call it "Resolver B." > > > > Can

Re: Several hosts behind a caching resolver

2019-11-24 Thread Eugene Grosbein
24.11.2019 19:34, Victor Sudakov wrote: > Dear Colleagues, > > Several hosts of the local network use a FreeBSD server with BIND or > local-unbound as a caching resolver. Let's call it "Resolver A." > Resolver A forwards all queries to another resolver, e.g. 8.8.8.8 or > some other, let's call it

[Bug 233622] panic: page not present fault when stopping VIMAGE jail on 12.0-RC2, netgraph

2019-11-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233622 --- Comment #8 from xsan --- I have the same problem, and it's very easy way to show that. I use `qjail` tool to manage jails. # first create jail, and use vnet for jail. qjail create -4 192.168.1.101 testjail qjail config -w em0 -v none t

Several hosts behind a caching resolver

2019-11-24 Thread Victor Sudakov
Dear Colleagues, Several hosts of the local network use a FreeBSD server with BIND or local-unbound as a caching resolver. Let's call it "Resolver A." Resolver A forwards all queries to another resolver, e.g. 8.8.8.8 or some other, let's call it "Resolver B." Can the operator of Resolver B figure