07.11.2019 14:32, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> Don't we have the option of doing soft re-classification? Where we
> recalculate the hash, and then do a netisr defer? I mean that'd burn
> a bunch of extra cpu cycles, but you gotta do what you gotta do.
If the host got a packet already, it can just
Lawrence Stewart wrote this message on Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 13:04 +1100:
> On 7/11/19 12:52 pm, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> > 07.11.2019 8:36, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
> >
> AES-GCM can run at over 1GB/sec on a single core, so as long as the
> traffic can be processed by multiple threads (vi
On 7/11/19 12:52 pm, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> 07.11.2019 8:36, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
>
AES-GCM can run at over 1GB/sec on a single core, so as long as the
traffic can be processed by multiple threads (via multiple queues
for example), it should be doable.
>>> I didn't be
07.11.2019 8:36, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
>>> AES-GCM can run at over 1GB/sec on a single core, so as long as the
>>> traffic can be processed by multiple threads (via multiple queues
>>> for example), it should be doable.
>>>
>>>
>> I didn't bench this setup (10Gb/s IPSec) but I believe we will ha
On 6/11/19 9:45 am, Olivier Cochard-Labbé wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 8:15 PM John-Mark Gurney wrote:
>
>> AES-GCM can run at over 1GB/sec on a single core, so as long as the
>> traffic can be processed by multiple threads (via multiple queues
>> for example), it should be doable.
>>
>>
> I d
Hi everyone, how you are doing well.
During the last months, I have been working with JAIL and VIMAGE to
perform some network test/validations.
I have been facing the following weird behaviour that while it has been
happening before, it used to be once in a while but now it is happening
almos
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240135
Bjoern A. Zeeb changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|New |Open
Assignee|n...@free
Am 06.11.2019 um 13:03 schrieb Eugene Grosbein:
06.11.2019 18:29, Muenz, Michael wrote:
Am 06.11.2019 um 01:21 schrieb Eugene Grosbein:
06.11.2019 4:55, Muenz, Michael wrote:
These were my short results via OPNsense on 4 year old XEONs.
So its 11.2, mostly untuned and strongswan as IPsec imp
On 06/11/2019 01:45, Olivier Cochard-Labbé wrote:
On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 8:15 PM John-Mark Gurney wrote:
AES-GCM can run at over 1GB/sec on a single core, so as long as the
traffic can be processed by multiple threads (via multiple queues
for example), it should be doable.
I didn't bench
06.11.2019 18:29, Muenz, Michael wrote:
> Am 06.11.2019 um 01:21 schrieb Eugene Grosbein:
>> 06.11.2019 4:55, Muenz, Michael wrote:
>>
>>> These were my short results via OPNsense on 4 year old XEONs.
>>> So its 11.2, mostly untuned and strongswan as IPsec implementation.
>>> If you need more deta
Am 06.11.2019 um 01:21 schrieb Eugene Grosbein:
06.11.2019 4:55, Muenz, Michael wrote:
These were my short results via OPNsense on 4 year old XEONs.
So its 11.2, mostly untuned and strongswan as IPsec implementation.
If you need more detailed specs just drop me a line.
https://www.routerperfor
11 matches
Mail list logo
