[Bug 241489] netmap + if_vlan panics related to 'Widen NET_EPOCH coverage' work (r353292)

2019-10-25 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241489 Kubilay Kocak changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||crash -- You are receiving this m

[Bug 241489] netmap + if_vlan panics related to 'Widen NET_EPOCH coverage' work (r353292)

2019-10-25 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241489 Kubilay Kocak changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-patch, needs-qa,

Re: AW: No SNMP ifHCInOctets counters for ipsec interfaces

2019-10-25 Thread Victor Gamov
Thanks for your clarification I'll try 12.1 later On 25/10/2019 19:13, hartmut.bra...@dlr.de wrote: Hi, They used to be enabled only when the bit rate reported by the interface was high enough (there is some wording in the corresponding RFC when the HC counters are required and when not). This

Re: soisconnected.

2019-10-25 Thread Dheeraj Kandula
Thanks Mark for the clarification. Dheeraj On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 12:15 PM Mark Johnston wrote: > On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 11:36:53AM -0400, Dheeraj Kandula wrote: > > Hi Mark, > >I am trying to understand the purpose of certain code in > > soisconnected. > > +freebsd-net > > > 1. When

Re: soisconnected.

2019-10-25 Thread Mark Johnston
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 11:36:53AM -0400, Dheeraj Kandula wrote: > Hi Mark, >I am trying to understand the purpose of certain code in > soisconnected. +freebsd-net > 1. When an upcall returns SO_ISCONNECTED, the sockbuf's lock is unlocked > and then soisconnected is invoked. This is done

AW: No SNMP ifHCInOctets counters for ipsec interfaces

2019-10-25 Thread Hartmut.Brandt
Hi, They used to be enabled only when the bit rate reported by the interface was high enough (there is some wording in the corresponding RFC when the HC counters are required and when not). This check was removed at some point - in 12.1 the Hc counters are unconditionally there. You may want to

[Bug 241489] netmap + if_vlan panics related to 'Widen NET_EPOCH coverage' work (r353292)

2019-10-25 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241489 --- Comment #1 from Hans Petter Selasky --- This patch looks correct. All if_transmit() functions should be under EPOCH (13-current) if I understand Gleb correctly. --HPS -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list fo

No SNMP ifHCInOctets counters for ipsec interfaces

2019-10-25 Thread Victor Gamov
Hi All In my FreeBSD 11.2-STABLE #0 r339734 I have no SNMP ifHCInOctets counters for ipsec interfaces: = IF-MIB::ifName.1 = STRING: vmx0 IF-MIB::ifName.2 = STRING: vmx1 IF-MIB::ifName.3 = STRING: lo0 IF-MIB::ifName.4 = STRING: vlan102 IF-MIB::ifName.6 = STRING: ipsec1632 IF-MIB::ifName.8 =

[Bug 241489] netmap + if_vlan panics related to 'Widen NET_EPOCH coverage' work (r353292)

2019-10-25 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241489 Aleksandr Fedorov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aleksandr.fedorov@itglobal.

Re: icmp v4 redirect timeout

2019-10-25 Thread Andrey V. Elsukov
On 22.10.2019 17:30, Victor Gamov wrote: > Hi All > > I discover the following problem: FreeBSD host install route recived by > ICMP-redirect from default GW and this route is permanents. > > > In my case FreeBSD 192.168.1.10/24 has 192.168.1.254 as default gateway. > This network has interconne

Re: How to disable tryforward ?

2019-10-25 Thread Andrey V. Elsukov
On 22.10.2019 08:38, k simon wrote: > Hi, > Tryforwad have merged 3 yeas ago, and it haven’t a sysctl to disable it , so > ECMP was broken past 3 years. Olivier has fired a bug : > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225792 , it seems that a > few of people cares it. > Andrey said

[Bug 241470] dummynet: setting bandwidth and delay causes repeatable panic: mpanic: Assertion in_epoch(net_epoch_preempt)

2019-10-25 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241470 Kubilay Kocak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|New |Open Keywords|panic