https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238796
--- Comment #15 from Cy Schubert ---
That's perfect, thank you. I'll do some testing here. I suspect the cause is
similar to a panic I am working on. Use your patch or the improved patch I
posted here while I dig into the root cause.
--
Y
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238796
--- Comment #14 from WHR ---
Good news. I has reproduced this bug in a FreeBSD 13.0-CURRENT r349753 testing
VM.
The steps are:
kldload ipl.ko
ifconfig tun0 plumb
ifconfig tun1 plumb
echo "pass in quick reply-to tun0:10.1.1.1 on tun0 proto
Any chance someone with a better understanding of how stateful
firewall rules work able to take a look at this with me? I'm trying to
make my firewall ruleset rock solid in the long run and this is one of
the occasions where Ihaven't been able to do so yet.
Any comment appreciated!
Steffen
On We
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238796
--- Comment #13 from Cy Schubert ---
Unfortunately I cannot accept patches until I can reproduce the problem here. I
have tested the rule in a VM with INVARIANTS and on my production firewall
without INVARIANTS. I am unable to verify that t
Hi,
I updated from r347365 to r349853. Now I get a panic on epair destroy
(one end needs to be in a jail, and inside the jail an IP address
needs to be assigned to the epair. If no ifconfig is used inside the
jail, there is no panic.
Another user reported something similar (but for him it
> On 9. Jul 2019, at 14:58, Paul wrote:
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> 9 July 2019, 15:34:29, by "Michael Tuexen" :
>
>>
>>
>>> On 8. Jul 2019, at 17:22, Paul wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 8 July 2019, 17:12:21, by "Michael Tuexen" :
>>>
> On 8. Jul 2019, at 15:24, Paul wrote:
>
> Hi Mich
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238796
--- Comment #12 from WHR ---
(In reply to Cy Schubert from comment #11)
Although this bug is always reproduce on that particular machine, with both
12.0-STABLE and 13.0-CURRENT kernels, I failed to reproduce it on a testing VM.
I plan to i
Hi Michael,
9 July 2019, 15:34:29, by "Michael Tuexen" :
>
>
> > On 8. Jul 2019, at 17:22, Paul wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > 8 July 2019, 17:12:21, by "Michael Tuexen" :
> >
> >>> On 8. Jul 2019, at 15:24, Paul wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Michael,
> >>>
> >>> 8 July 2019, 15:53:15, by "Michael Tuex
> On 8. Jul 2019, at 17:22, Paul wrote:
>
>
>
> 8 July 2019, 17:12:21, by "Michael Tuexen" :
>
>>> On 8. Jul 2019, at 15:24, Paul wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Michael,
>>>
>>> 8 July 2019, 15:53:15, by "Michael Tuexen" :
>>>
> On 8. Jul 2019, at 12:37, Paul wrote:
>
> Hi team,
>
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238796
--- Comment #11 from Cy Schubert ---
Unfortunately I cannot accept a patch for something I cannot reproduce. AFAIAC
your patch does not fix any bug. Help me reproduce it here then.
A patch for something I cannot verify or reproduce is not
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238796
WHR changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Closed |Open
Resolution|Not A Bug
11 matches
Mail list logo
