https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238796
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|New |Open
Assignee|b...@freeb
> 25.06.2019 3:16, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
>
> >> from Nick Wolff:
> >>
> >>> Yes this is no issue just need to make sure you don't have an default
> >>> route
> >>> on your Ethernet interface(May need to set a static) and that the hotspot
> >>> network and intranet network doesn't overlap.
> >>
25.06.2019 3:16, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
>> from Nick Wolff:
>>
>>> Yes this is no issue just need to make sure you don't have an default route
>>> on your Ethernet interface(May need to set a static) and that the hotspot
>>> network and intranet network doesn't overlap.
>>
>> To use the ethernet,
Microsoft account
Unusual sign-in activity We detected something unusual about a recent sign-in
to your Microsoft account Sign-in details Country/region: United StatesIP
address: 104.194.220.159 Date: 6/25/2019 11:28 AM (EET) Platform: Windows
Browser: Firefox Please go to your recent activit
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230498
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||n...@freebsd.org
Flag
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230498
--- Comment #23 from WHR ---
I'm running a 12.0-STABLE r349024 amd64 system; 2 PPP over SSH tunnels (as a
server) with the user space ppp(8) implementation running on it.
I later noticed the fix has already been MFCed into 12-STABLE branch
On 2019-06-24 19:33, Ultima wrote:
Hello Mel,
While it may be possible to have an IPv6 only environment, I don't
think it is really viable. There are simply too many things that don't run
on or have very limited support for IPv6 that it makes it very hard
to drop IPv4 altogether and until some
Hello Mel,
While it may be possible to have an IPv6 only environment, I don't
think it is really viable. There are simply too many things that don't run
on or have very limited support for IPv6 that it makes it very hard
to drop IPv4 altogether and until something comes along forcing the
move it
I'm looking to set up a pure-IPv6 environment to test the viability of
it. I tried this a few years ago and fell flat on my face due to the
lack of NAT64 and DNS64 support.
Reading through docs now, it looks like unbound has a DNS64 module, and
NAT64 is baked into ipfw. Waving a hand at bug-
from Dave Cottlehuber:
> > On Fri, 21 Jun 2019, at 04:33, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> > Is it possible to build and install FreeBSD so as to be bootable and access
> > the internet with an Ethernet card that doesn't work in FreeBSD?
> > Could Ethernet support be obtained through UEFI?
> from Nick Wolff:
>
> > Yes this is no issue just need to make sure you don't have an default route
> > on your Ethernet interface(May need to set a static) and that the hotspot
> > network and intranet network doesn't overlap.
>
> To use the ethernet, I believe I need
>
> route add default 192
On 06/24/2019 3:01 pm, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
24.06.2019 21:32, Larry Rosenman пишет:
Got 2 of these today, and I have cores
Ideas?
r349200.
Unread portion of the kernel message buffer:
panic: ng_snd_item: 42 != 1414
cpuid = 10
time = 1561382494
KDB: stack backtrace:
db_trace_self_wrapper
24.06.2019 21:32, Larry Rosenman пишет:
> Got 2 of these today, and I have cores
> Ideas?
> r349200.
>
> Unread portion of the kernel message buffer:
> panic: ng_snd_item: 42 != 1414
> cpuid = 10
> time = 1561382494
> KDB: stack backtrace:
> db_trace_self_wrapper() at db_trace_self_wrapper+0x2
from Nick Wolff:
> Yes this is no issue just need to make sure you don't have an default route
> on your Ethernet interface(May need to set a static) and that the hotspot
> network and intranet network doesn't overlap.
To use the ethernet, I believe I need
route add default 192.168.0.1
if I don
Thomas,
Yes this is no issue just need to make sure you don't have an default route
on your Ethernet interface(May need to set a static) and that the hotspot
network and intranet network doesn't overlap.
On Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 9:26 PM Thomas Mueller wrote:
> I would like to know if it is possi
Got 2 of these today, and I have cores
Ideas?
r349200.
borg.lerctr.org dumped core - see /var/crash/vmcore.10
Mon Jun 24 08:36:45 CDT 2019
FreeBSD borg.lerctr.org 13.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 13.0-CURRENT r349200 LER-MINIMAL
amd64
panic: ng_snd_item: 42 != 1414
GNU gdb (GDB) 8.3 [GDB v8.3 for
>
> Hi all,
>
> I am not on this mailing list. So, all responses should be sent
> to my personal address.
>
> I just noticed somewhat confusing network behavior when I was
> using wireshark to understand why certain connections have been
> unexpectedly slow.
>
> My 11.3 stable (latest update 20
Den tors 20 juni 2019 kl 16:39 skrev Roger Pau Monné :
>
> Do you see the same issues with external connections? Have you tested
> throughput between two FreeBSD 12.0 VM running on different hosts?
>
>
I've tested 12.0-RELEASE between two hosts (XCP-ng 7.6.0 and Citrix
CXenserver 7.2.0) over Gbit
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238789
--- Comment #2 from Greg Becker ---
Thanks Kubilay! Sure, give me some time to analyze the code to ensure the
patch is production worthy.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238789
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|New |Open
Flags|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238789
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||panic, patch
Assignee|b..
Hi all,
I am not on this mailing list. So, all responses should be sent
to my personal address.
I just noticed somewhat confusing network behavior when I was
using wireshark to understand why certain connections have been
unexpectedly slow.
My 11.3 stable (latest update 2019-06-23) seems to d
On Fri, 21 Jun 2019, at 04:33, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> Is it possible to build and install FreeBSD so as to be bootable and access
> the internet with an Ethernet card that doesn't work in FreeBSD?
>
> Could Ethernet support be obtained through UEFI?
>
> Or could FreeBSD be installed on anoth
23 matches
Mail list logo
