Re: Is netmap jumbo frames broken in STABLE?

2019-03-19 Thread Vincenzo Maffione
Hi, It's not supported yet. But I think it is reasonably feasible to add jumbo frames support on head and stable/12, by improving iflib netmap support. I hope to find the time to do this soon. Cheers, Vincenzo Il giorno lun 18 mar 2019 alle ore 02:52 Andrew Vylegzhanin < avv...@gmail.com> ha

[Bug 236383] [ral] Kernel panic in ral(4)

2019-03-19 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236383 --- Comment #5 from Sergey Anokhin --- Part of etc.conf ifconfig_sk0="inet 10.0.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0" cloned_interfaces="bridge0" ifconfig_rl0="inet 192.168.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0" ifconfig_bridge0="addm rl0 addm wlan0 up" ifconfig

[Bug 236383] [ral] Kernel panic in ral(4)

2019-03-19 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236383 --- Comment #4 from Sergey Anokhin --- (In reply to Eugene Grosbein from comment #3) Will it enough? Please let me know if you want to see additional info ~# pciconf -lvvv hostb0@pci0:0:0:0: class=0x06 card=0x820b1043 chip=0x29a0

Re: SD-Wan

2019-03-19 Thread Kajetan Staszkiewicz
On 19.03.19 14:47, Sami Halabi wrote: > Hi everyone, > > All buzz around Software-Defined Wan.. I wonder what is in the base of its > fundamentals and what does FreeBSD has to offer in the subject. You can always build solutions using normal open source components. FreeBSD itself can do some net

SD-Wan

2019-03-19 Thread Sami Halabi
Hi everyone, All buzz around Software-Defined Wan.. I wonder what is in the base of its fundamentals and what does FreeBSD has to offer in the subject. Sami ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net

[Bug 236383] [ral] Kernel panic in ral(4)

2019-03-19 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236383 --- Comment #3 from Eugene Grosbein --- The panic is in ral(4) driver for wireless NIC. Please describe your hardware including output of dmesg and pciconf -lvvv and show your wifi configuration. -- You are receiving this mail because: Yo

[Bug 236383] [ral] Kernel panic in ral(4)

2019-03-19 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236383 Eugene Grosbein changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Kernel panic|[ral] Kernel panic in

[Bug 236383] Kernel panic

2019-03-19 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236383 Eugene Grosbein changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[netgraph] Kernel panic |Kernel panic |

[Bug 236383] [netgraph] Kernel panic detaching ng_iface in 12.0

2019-03-19 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236383 Eugene Grosbein changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #202920|0 |1 is obsolete|

Re: Bridges on VLAN-tagged interfaces.

2019-03-19 Thread Eric Bautsch
Hi Patrick. I get that point, but then I have two options only: I somehow convince the BIOS to do a network boot over a VLAN for installation - not a capability this BIOS appears to have, or I end up creating a whole new VLAN that's either routed or has YP, DNS, time and installation servers

Re: Bridges on VLAN-tagged interfaces.

2019-03-19 Thread Patrick M. Hausen
Hi! > Am 18.03.2019 um 22:12 schrieb Eric Bautsch : > I now have a bridge0 on re0.33 which works, great. > I now configure a bridge1 which contains re0 and put an IP on that bridge, > and hey presto, that IP pings, but the IP on bridge0 on VLAN 33 stops pinging. IMHO you should not be mixing VLA