[Bug 235927] FreeBSD does not reply to ICMP requests when assigned an ip in 240.0.0.0/8

2019-02-21 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235927 --- Comment #7 from Rodney W. Grimes --- (In reply to Loganaden Velvindron from comment #6) >Linux has already accepted a patch to allow assignment of 240.0.0.0/4: >https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg540240.html This patch appears to

Re: Running PPPoE server in jail, possible with VNET?

2019-02-21 Thread Eugene Grosbein
22.02.2019 2:41, BulkMailForRudy wrote: > > On 2/20/19 1:13 PM, Eugene Grosbein wrote: >> 21.02.2019 3:37, BulkMailForRudy wrote: >> >>> Dear FreeBSD-net, >>> >>> PPPoE has some broadcast ethernet frames... >>> >>> I have epair0a on my bridge and epair0b in the jail, but the jail doesn't >>> get

[Bug 235927] FreeBSD does not reply to ICMP requests when assigned an ip in 240.0.0.0/8

2019-02-21 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235927 --- Comment #6 from Loganaden Velvindron --- (In reply to Rodney W. Grimes from comment #4) There is a scheduled talk about this effort at netdev: https://netdevconf.org/0x13/session.html?talk-ipv4-unicast-expansions Linux has already acc

[Bug 235927] FreeBSD does not reply to ICMP requests when assigned an ip in 240.0.0.0/8

2019-02-21 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235927 --- Comment #5 from Loganaden Velvindron --- (In reply to Conrad Meyer from comment #3) Yes, I'm also working on the 2 other areas. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 235927] FreeBSD does not reply to ICMP requests when assigned an ip in 240.0.0.0/8

2019-02-21 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235927 Rodney W. Grimes changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|FreeBSD does not reply to |FreeBSD does not reply to

[Bug 235927] FreeBSD does not reply to ICMP requests when assigned a 240.0.0.0/8

2019-02-21 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235927 Rodney W. Grimes changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|FreeBSD does not reply to |FreeBSD does not reply to

[Bug 235927] FreeBSD does not reply to ICMP requests when assigned a Class-E address

2019-02-21 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235927 --- Comment #3 from Conrad Meyer --- Note that there are two other Class E checks, at least referencing the same macro name, that should probably be turned off at the same time as the icmp check (if turning off the check is the right thing

[Bug 235927] FreeBSD does not reply to ICMP requests when assigned a Class-E address

2019-02-21 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235927 --- Comment #2 from Conrad Meyer --- Regardless of whether or not using class E addresses is canonical, we half-ass it today. If they're non-canonical, we should *not* allow them to be assigned to interfaces. If they are, we shouldn't fil

[Bug 235927] FreeBSD does not reply to ICMP requests when assigned a Class-E address

2019-02-21 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235927 Rodney W. Grimes changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rgri...@freebsd.org --- Comment

[Bug 235918] with more than 1 vlan, ix0 gets 'No carrier.' ixgbe_driver_version[] = "4.0.1-k"

2019-02-21 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235918 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||IntelNetworking Summary|

[Bug 235927] FreeBSD does not reply to ICMP requests when assigned a Class-E address

2019-02-21 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235927 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|n...@freebsd.org Keywords

[Bug 235920] ifconfig: unable to create another interface after renaming the previous one with the same name

2019-02-21 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235920 Andriy Voskoboinyk changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|n...@freebsd.org -- You are

Re: Running PPPoE server in jail, possible with VNET?

2019-02-21 Thread BulkMailForRudy
On 2/20/19 1:13 PM, Eugene Grosbein wrote: 21.02.2019 3:37, BulkMailForRudy wrote: Dear FreeBSD-net, PPPoE has some broadcast ethernet frames... I have epair0a on my bridge and epair0b in the jail, but the jail doesn't get any PADI (PPPoE packets destinged to ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff). Is there

Re: Running PPPoE server in jail, possible with VNET?

2019-02-21 Thread Patrick M. Hausen
Hi all, > Am 21.02.2019 um 08:23 schrieb Alexander Zagrebin : > To pass PPPoE packets via bridge you have to set the kernel variable > net.link.bridge.pfil_onlyip to 0 (`sysctl > net.link.bridge.pfil_onlyip=0`)… Doesn’t this apply only if you have some kind of packet filter active on the bridge