В Wed, 20 Feb 2019 12:37:39 -0800
BulkMailForRudy пишет:
> PPPoE has some broadcast ethernet frames...
>
> I have epair0a on my bridge and epair0b in the jail, but the jail
> doesn't get any PADI (PPPoE packets destinged to ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff).
>
> Is there a way to have bridge pass broadcast e
21.02.2019 3:37, BulkMailForRudy wrote:
> Dear FreeBSD-net,
>
> PPPoE has some broadcast ethernet frames...
>
> I have epair0a on my bridge and epair0b in the jail, but the jail doesn't get
> any PADI (PPPoE packets destinged to ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff).
>
> Is there a way to have bridge pass broadc
Dear FreeBSD-net,
PPPoE has some broadcast ethernet frames...
I have epair0a on my bridge and epair0b in the jail, but the jail
doesn't get any PADI (PPPoE packets destinged to ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff).
Is there a way to have bridge pass broadcast ethernet frames? (tcpdump
in the jail shows no PAD
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=170244
Rodney W. Grimes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rgri...@freebsd.org
--- Comment
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235704
--- Comment #6 from Kristof Provost ---
Thanks. You're right, the unit numbers are used to find the device node (or
vice versa), so they need to be system-unique.
I'll take a look at what we can do about that.
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235704
--- Comment #5 from genneko...@gmail.com ---
Thank you for working on this issue.
I've briefly tested the patch and confirmed the reported issue was solved
with it.
I also confirmed that it changed the way unit numbers are assigned to if_tu
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 5:37 PM Peter G. wrote:
> On 19/02/2019 14:06, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 1:38 PM Peter G. wrote:
> >
> >> On 15/02/2019 17:49, Peter G. wrote:
> >>> Now the GRE tunnel
> >>>
> ifconfig gre6 create
> ifconfig gre6 inet6 fc01:e::100 fc:02:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=170244
Andriy Voskoboinyk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||a...@freebsd.org
S
