https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226289
Rodney W. Grimes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmaffi...@freebsd.org
--- Comme
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226289
Rodney W. Grimes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|11.1-RELEASE|11.2-RELEASE
CC
Hello all,
I am testing IP_BINDANY functionality with a small C program. I can
bind to a foreign (non existing) address, and syn packets are being
sent with the bound source IP address and port. Return (ACK) packets
are reaching the host (I can see the SYN-ACK packet in tcpdump), but
the thir
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226289
--- Comment #3 from wings1...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Eric Joyner from comment #2)
I'm not using jumbo frames at the moment.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_
Hello, I have the same problem with you, according to your method, I still
can not be accepted by the kernel.
--
Sent from: http://freebsd.1045724.x6.nabble.com/freebsd-net-f4005075.html
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.or
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226289
Eric Joyner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||e...@freebsd.org
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226289
wings1...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wings1...@gmail.com
--- Comme
All -
The FRRouting project has some basic support for rfc 5549 and I've
been asked to see if it is possible to get this bit of code working
with the FRRouting freebsd kernel interface. What is RFC 5549 you
ask? The tl;dr of it is that you have v4 prefixes w/ a v6 gateway.
For some more backgrou
> Rodney W. Grimes wrote this message on Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 05:19 -0700:
> > And I have read case law that boiled down to the presents vs absence
> > of a comma in an agreement that had results far beyond "minor".
>
> For those currious about this case:
> https://www.bostonglobe.com/business/201
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 06:54:01AM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 05:19:33AM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > > And I have read case law that boiled down to the presents vs absence
> > > of a comma
> >
> > If we are now going to evaluate all proposed changes to FreeBS
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227654
Kristof Provost changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|In Prog
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227654
--- Comment #12 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: kp
Date: Wed Oct 24 18:19:32 UTC 2018
New revision: 339691
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/339691
Log:
MFC r339547:
vlan: Fix panic
Rodney W. Grimes wrote this message on Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 05:19 -0700:
> And I have read case law that boiled down to the presents vs absence
> of a comma in an agreement that had results far beyond "minor".
For those currious about this case:
https://www.bostonglobe.com/business/2017/03/16/lack
On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 11:38:46AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> ...
> I'd also suggest that rl stands in stark contrast to the cs, wb, sn, smc,
> sf, tl, tx and vr drivers, which nobody has mentioned in this thread, and
> which I doubt are in use in any FreeBSD system of any age today.
Warner, I ha
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227654
--- Comment #11 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: kp
Date: Wed Oct 24 17:32:31 UTC 2018
New revision: 339690
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/339690
Log:
MFC r339547:
vlan: Fix panic
I've benchmarked if_gre and if_gif encapsulation on not-so-powerful
hardware. Test is very simple: single as-fast-as-possible TCP stream via
tunnel to much-more performant server over 1G physical interface.
I was surprised by very high price of encapsulation with standard MTU
of 1280 bytes. Per
> On 24 Oct 2018, at 14:39, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> [stuff trimmed]
>
>> >> The FCP process itself is unclear on this point,
>> >> I think this should be clarified.
>> >>
>> >> It is much more clear on post approval:
>> >>Changes after acceptance
>> >>
>> >>FCPs may need revisi
> "Rodney W. Grimes" wrote:
> > We could add that once the document is submitted to core
> > any change to it between submitting and vote by core requires
> > core to be involved, even if it is simply an ack of a change
> > has been made to what was submitted.
>
> Yes !
And to expand on that furt
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 05:19:33AM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> And I have read case law that boiled down to the presents vs absence
> of a comma
If we are now going to evaluate all proposed changes to FreeBSD on the
same rigid principles as the US legal system, I'm done.
mcl
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 05:19:33AM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > And I have read case law that boiled down to the presents vs absence
> > of a comma
>
> If we are now going to evaluate all proposed changes to FreeBSD on the
> same rigid principles as the US legal system, I'm done.
I do not
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 5:02 AM Bob Bishop wrote:
>
> > On 24 Oct 2018, at 01:23, Warner Losh wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 6:02 PM Rodney W. Grimes <
> > freebsd-...@pdx.rh.cn85.dnsmgr.net> wrote:
> >
> >> -- Start of PGP signed section.
> >>> On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 04:26:45PM -0700,
> On 24 Oct 2018, at 01:23, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 6:02 PM Rodney W. Grimes <
> freebsd-...@pdx.rh.cn85.dnsmgr.net> wrote:
>
>> -- Start of PGP signed section.
>>> On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 04:26:45PM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 5:07 PM Rod
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 6:19 AM Rodney W. Grimes <
freebsd-...@pdx.rh.cn85.dnsmgr.net> wrote:
> > > On 24 Oct 2018, at 01:23, Warner Losh wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 6:02 PM Rodney W. Grimes <
> > > freebsd-...@pdx.rh.cn85.dnsmgr.net> wrote:
> > >
> > >> -- Start of PGP signed sect
"Rodney W. Grimes" wrote:
> We could add that once the document is submitted to core
> any change to it between submitting and vote by core requires
> core to be involved, even if it is simply an ack of a change
> has been made to what was submitted.
Yes !
Cheers,
Julian
--
Julian Stacey, Comput
I suggest posters to this lively thread could strip inherited personal
CC addresses . Then ~/.procmailrc that sorts list mail away from
real personal ~/mail/Inbox will protect xbiff from beeping so much :-)
Cheers,
Julian
--
Julian Stacey, Computer Consultant, Systems Engineer, BSD Linux Unix, M
... deleted ...
... cc list trimmed, getting too many recepient gripes from mailman ...
> > > > diff --git a/fcp-.md b/fcp-.md
> > > > index b4fe0f3..c8cc6f7 100644
> > > > --- a/fcp-.md
> > > > +++ b/fcp-.md
> > > > @@ -144,7 +144,10 @@ When the discussion of a change has come to
> > On 24 Oct 2018, at 01:23, Warner Losh wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 6:02 PM Rodney W. Grimes <
> > freebsd-...@pdx.rh.cn85.dnsmgr.net> wrote:
> >
> >> -- Start of PGP signed section.
> >>> On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 04:26:45PM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
28 matches
Mail list logo
