https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231143
Eugene Grosbein changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||regression
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231143
Eugene Grosbein changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://reviews.freebsd.org
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231143
Eugene Grosbein changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Ipfw fwd with route(8) |[regression] ipfw fwd wrong
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166724
--- Comment #35 from Alex Dupre ---
I don't think I've ever said this issue is good :-)
What I said is that in my environment when I switched to 11.2-RELEASE it was
happening less frequently. With the FreeBSD driver is easy to detect it,
b
I am new to FreeBSD so please forgive (and correct) wrong terminology and
concepts.
I’ve installed FreeBSD 11.2 as a VM host and run in to a problem with multicast
packets over a bridge not being seen by programs [on the host] listening on the
bridge’s physical interface constituent (igb1), whi
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231143
Eugene Grosbein changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||n...@freebsd.org
--
You are rec
Hi,
I don't think the panic depends on the architecture. Also, it does not
depend on using emulated mode or not.
We have seen this happening on x86_64 on FreeBSD 12 head.
As John-Mark says, kdloading netmap.ko is not enough. You need to open a
netmap port corresponding
to any network interface,
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218270
Ed Maste changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.freebsd.org/bu
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=148807
Ed Maste changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.freebsd.org/bu
04.09.2018 23:57, Ryan Moeller wrote:
>> The NIC's are Intel based using igb kernel driver:
>>
>> igb0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 9000
>> options=6403bb
>
> I see your MTU is 9000, and as described by the other thread you linked to,
> there are issues with 9k jumbo cluster allocation.
> Some detai
> The NIC's are Intel based using igb kernel driver:
>
> igb0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 9000
> options=6403bb
I see your MTU is 9000, and as described by the other thread you linked to,
there are issues with 9k jumbo cluster allocation.
Some detailed notes are here, but the quick summary is: set
Marko Zec wrote this message on Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 16:43 +0200:
> On Sat, 1 Sep 2018 14:11:23 -0700
> John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> > Vincenzo Maffione wrote this message on Sat, Sep 01, 2018 at 22:25
> > +0200:
> ...
> > > On x86_64 netmap is not built as a module, so everything works
> > > fine. I
On Sat, 1 Sep 2018 14:11:23 -0700
John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> Vincenzo Maffione wrote this message on Sat, Sep 01, 2018 at 22:25
> +0200:
...
> > On x86_64 netmap is not built as a module, so everything works
> > fine. I don't see any reason why it should be a module in aarch64.
>
> Well, sys/mod
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210726
Kurt Jaeger changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|11.2-STABLE |CURRENT
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210726
Kurt Jaeger changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|10.3-STABLE |11.2-STABLE
--
You are receiving th
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231144
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|n...@freebsd.org
--
You are receiv
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231151
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sbr...@freebsd.org
Keywor
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231143
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|n...@freebsd.org |i...@freebsd.org
Keyword
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231143
Eugene Grosbein changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #196851|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231143
--- Comment #2 from Eugene Grosbein ---
Created attachment 196851
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=196851&action=edit
proposed fix
Please test the patch fixing the problem: fetch it, run "cd /usr/src && patch <
/pa
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231143
Eugene Grosbein changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|New |Open
CC|
Thank you Еugen for your reply.
You have very clearly explained how to disable fast forwarding via
kernel ipsec.
From myself I will add. On this object (Server), the priority is in
favor of fast forwarding. Filtering ICMP packets I will make ipfw
rules.I think that even with the use of ipfw f
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231143
Eugene Grosbein changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|n...@freebsd.org
--
You are rec
At your request Eugen, I fill in the Problem Report:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231143
03.09.2018 12:33, Eugene Grosbein пишет:
03.09.2018 14:02, Runer wrote:
*Hello Community!
A situation has arisen in which ipfw fwd stops working when
RTF_BLACKHOLE or RTF_REJECT, RO
24 matches
Mail list logo