On Thu, May 31, 2018, 00:13 Rodney W. Grimes <
freebsd-...@pdx.rh.cn85.dnsmgr.net> wrote:
> > On Wed, 30 May 2018, at 17:46, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > > > > > > > ifconfig_lo1_aliases="inet 10.241.0.0-15/16"
> >
> > > > > > > > lo1: flags=8049 metric 0 mtu
> 16384
> > > > > > > > inet 10
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=157182
Peter Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||petercjclif...@gmail.com
--- Comme
> On Wed, 30 May 2018, at 17:46, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > > > > > > ifconfig_lo1_aliases="inet 10.241.0.0-15/16"
>
> > > > > > > lo1: flags=8049 metric 0 mtu 16384
> > > > > > > inet 10.241.0.0 netmask 0x
> > > > > > > inet 10.241.0.1 netmask 0x
> > > > > > >
Could you please try 334117 vs 334118 and see if 334118 introduces
this regression?
-M
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 2:48 PM, Rodney W. Grimes
wrote:
>> On Wed, 30 May 2018 17:46:06 +0200, "Rodney W. Grimes" wrote:
>> >
>> > > On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 07:44:52AM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
>> > > >
> On Wed, 30 May 2018 17:46:06 +0200, "Rodney W. Grimes" wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 07:44:52AM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 03:59:12PM +0200, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
> > > > > > On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 3:40 PM, Dave Cottlehuber
> > > > > > wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2018, at 17:46, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > > > > > ifconfig_lo1_aliases="inet 10.241.0.0-15/16"
> > > > > > lo1: flags=8049 metric 0 mtu 16384
> > > > > > inet 10.241.0.0 netmask 0x
> > > > > > inet 10.241.0.1 netmask 0x
> > > > > > inet 10.2
On Wed, 30 May 2018 17:46:06 +0200, "Rodney W. Grimes" wrote:
>
> > On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 07:44:52AM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > > > On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 03:59:12PM +0200, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 3:40 PM, Dave Cottlehuber
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
>
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60293
Eugene Grosbein changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Open|Closed
Resolution|---
I think the biggest hurdle is that for igb, the pf and vf should be split. That
was being considered at the same time as the ixgbe/ixgbevf split, but there was
little interest at the time.
Jeff
On 5/30/18, 9:13 AM, "owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org on behalf of Harry
Schmalzbauer"
wrote:
Am 30.05.2018 um 17:53 schrieb Kevin Bowling:
Harry,
I wasn’t aware of anyone desiring vf support for igb but I’ll take a
look at it for you if you can test -current with patches when I’m ready.
My motive is more to validate and refine the iflib functionality and
this is a good exercise.
Ch
Harry,
I wasn’t aware of anyone desiring vf support for igb but I’ll take a look
at it for you if you can test -current with patches when I’m ready. My
motive is more to validate and refine the iflib functionality and this is a
good exercise.
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 8:20 AM Harry Schmalzbauer
wr
> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 07:44:52AM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 03:59:12PM +0200, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
> > > > On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 3:40 PM, Dave Cottlehuber
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I have 10.241.0.0-15/16 bound to lo1 for jails, and I just realise
Am 30.05.2018 um 16:45 schrieb Ryan Stone:
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 12:58 PM Sean Bruno wrote:
Does anyone have a process for testing the VF drivers (ixgbe igb, etc)
in FreeBSD without actually firing up linux to instantiate a VM or using
EC2?
We have native support for creating VFs for ixl and
On Wed, 30 May 2018, at 15:40, Dave Cottlehuber wrote:
> I have 10.241.0.0-15/16 bound to lo1 for jails, and I just realised it>
> doesn't work anymore. Boxes at $DAYJOB use the same config and
> work just> fine on 11.1R/amd64, otherwise I'd be fired this used to work
> ~ 1> month ago, both o
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180722
Steve Wills changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|n...@freebsd.org |blueto...@freebsd.org
--- Comment #
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180722
Steve Wills changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||swi...@freebsd.org
--- Comment #4 fr
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 07:44:52AM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 03:59:12PM +0200, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 3:40 PM, Dave Cottlehuber
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I have 10.241.0.0-15/16 bound to lo1 for jails, and I just realised it
> > > >
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 12:58 PM Sean Bruno wrote:
>
> Does anyone have a process for testing the VF drivers (ixgbe igb, etc)
> in FreeBSD without actually firing up linux to instantiate a VM or using
> EC2?
We have native support for creating VFs for ixl and ixgbe (and cxgbe).
For igb you're out
> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 03:59:12PM +0200, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
> > On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 3:40 PM, Dave Cottlehuber
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I have 10.241.0.0-15/16 bound to lo1 for jails, and I just realised it
> > > doesn't work anymore. Boxes at $DAYJOB use the same config and work just
> >
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180722
--- Comment #3 from Anil Gulati ---
I am the reporter but I don't have a working BSD install right now, sorry.
I guess I can say it won't affect me if you close the bug report.
Thanks
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the as
Bengt Ahlgren writes:
> Doug Ambrisko writes:
>
>> On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 02:17:21PM +0300, Zeus Panchenko wrote:
>> | Bengt Ahlgren wrote:
>> | > Is there a standard "rc.conf" way to configure 8021x authentication on
>> | > wired ethernet?
>> |
>> | looks like it's to be something like: ifco
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 03:59:12PM +0200, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 3:40 PM, Dave Cottlehuber wrote:
>
> > I have 10.241.0.0-15/16 bound to lo1 for jails, and I just realised it
> > doesn't work anymore. Boxes at $DAYJOB use the same config and work just
> > fine on 11.1R/a
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 3:40 PM, Dave Cottlehuber wrote:
> I have 10.241.0.0-15/16 bound to lo1 for jails, and I just realised it
> doesn't work anymore. Boxes at $DAYJOB use the same config and work just
> fine on 11.1R/amd64, otherwise I'd be fired this used to work ~ 1 month
> ago, both on
I have 10.241.0.0-15/16 bound to lo1 for jails, and I just realised it doesn't
work anymore. Boxes at $DAYJOB use the same config and work just fine on
11.1R/amd64, otherwise I'd be fired this used to work ~ 1 month ago, both
on my desktop, and my laptop, and now doesn't.
Have I mis-config
Am 30.05.2018 um 10:43 schrieb Vitalij Satanivskij:
Most likely threading only part of problem with iperf3.
As I say before - I'm check iperf3 in paralel by running multiple instanse on
diferent's ports
Speed is always same.
But maybe 2-3 instance to few for noticible result's.
For me most co
Most likely threading only part of problem with iperf3.
As I say before - I'm check iperf3 in paralel by running multiple instanse on
diferent's ports
Speed is always same.
But maybe 2-3 instance to few for noticible result's.
For me most confusion was speed aroud 10Gbit on pure link showed
It prints these messages when WiFi is used.
What is the reason?
Thanks,
Yuri
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
27 matches
Mail list logo
