[Bug 85086] [ef] [patch] Locking fixes for ef(4) (+removes mem. leak)

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85086 Brooks Davis changed: What|Removed |Added Status|Open|Closed Resolution|---

[Bug 165463] FreeBSD doesn't work with NIC based on RLT8111E

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165463 Andriy Gapon changed: What|Removed |Added Status|Open|Closed Resolution|---

[Bug 165463] FreeBSD doesn't work with NIC based on RLT8111E

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165463 --- Comment #6 from John Nielsen --- I vote to close it. I haven't had any issues with RLT8111E since 10.0 and I've been actively using the hardware since then (now on 11.x). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee fo

Re: Testing VF/PF code

Am 29.05.2018 um 20:19 schrieb Lewis Donzis: This may be a red herring, but we’d be happy to see VF support for VMware SR-IOV in those drivers. We did a little bit of experimenting with it, but it looked like the code was a long way from working in that environment. ixlv(4) is working fine h

Re: Testing VF/PF code

Here are the steps that we use. If you just want to use bare metal, I think you’ll need to use passthrough : false; in the .conf. · The only supported output from virtual machines is serial console (i.e. you don't get a nice GUI if you use a Linux guest) · You should start your VM

Re: Testing VF/PF code

This may be a red herring, but we’d be happy to see VF support for VMware SR-IOV in those drivers. We did a little bit of experimenting with it, but it looked like the code was a long way from working in that environment. > On May 29, 2018, at 1:15 PM, Kevin Bowling wrote: > > iovctl worked a

Re: Testing VF/PF code

On 05/29/18 12:15, Kevin Bowling wrote: > iovctl worked at one point with ixgbe. I don’t recall if there is any > way to attach the vf directly if you do that but you can use ppt driver > to pass them into bhyve.  > > On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 9:58 AM Sean Bruno > wrote

Re: Testing VF/PF code

iovctl worked at one point with ixgbe. I don’t recall if there is any way to attach the vf directly if you do that but you can use ppt driver to pass them into bhyve. On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 9:58 AM Sean Bruno wrote: > Does anyone have a process for testing the VF drivers (ixgbe igb, etc) > in F

Re: Testing VF/PF code

On 05/29/18 11:55, Harry Schmalzbauer wrote: > Am 29.05.2018 um 18:57 schrieb Sean Bruno: >> Does anyone have a process for testing the VF drivers (ixgbe igb, etc) >> in FreeBSD without actually firing up linux to instantiate a VM or using >> EC2? >> >> sean > > To some limited extent I have acc

Re: Testing VF/PF code

Am 29.05.2018 um 18:57 schrieb Sean Bruno: Does anyone have a process for testing the VF drivers (ixgbe igb, etc) in FreeBSD without actually firing up linux to instantiate a VM or using EC2? sean To some limited extent I have access to a productive host (ESXi 6) providing VFs (PF=x722@C624).

Re: GRE/gif/netgraph tunnel speed on 10Gbit channel

Am 29.05.2018 um 16:02 schrieb Rodney W. Grimes: Am 29.05.2018 um 13:33 schrieb Vitalij Satanivskij: MM> Can you try MTU 1400 on GRE0 and MSS of 1300 just for testing? MM> With this values I get 4600Mbit sending and 1400Mbit receiving with MM> iperf and 10 parallel streams. MM> UUUPSS looks lik

Testing VF/PF code

Does anyone have a process for testing the VF drivers (ixgbe igb, etc) in FreeBSD without actually firing up linux to instantiate a VM or using EC2? sean signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[Bug 187718] [igb] UDP bad performance and out-of-order packet with iperf3 and igb(4) drivers

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187718 Rodney W. Grimes changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rgri...@freebsd.org --- Comment

[Bug 224247] [patch] RFC 6980 requires to drop fragmented IPv6 neighbour discovery

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224247 l...@donnerhacke.de changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |Unable to Reproduce

[Bug 181236] [igb] igb driver unstable work

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181236 Sean Bruno changed: What|Removed |Added Status|Open|Closed Resolution|---

[Bug 187718] [igb] UDP bad performance and out-of-order packet with iperf3 and igb(4) drivers

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187718 Sean Bruno changed: What|Removed |Added Status|Open|In Progress --- Comment #3 from Sean

[Bug 175734] no ethernet detected on system with EG20T PCH chipset ATOM E6xx series

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175734 Sean Bruno changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |Overcome By Events Status

[Bug 189531] [fxp] Wake on Lan (WOL) enabled for Intel 82562EZ ethernet adapter, but WOL does not work

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189531 Sean Bruno changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |Not Enough Information St

[Bug 177139] [igb] igb drops ethernet ports 2 and 3

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177139 Sean Bruno changed: What|Removed |Added Status|Open|Closed Resolution|---

Re: GRE/gif/netgraph tunnel speed on 10Gbit channel

> Am 29.05.2018 um 13:33 schrieb Vitalij Satanivskij: > > MM> Can you try MTU 1400 on GRE0 and MSS of 1300 just for testing? > MM> With this values I get 4600Mbit sending and 1400Mbit receiving with > MM> iperf and 10 parallel streams. > MM> > > UUUPSS looks like i have problem with metodology

[Bug 228412] Kernel panic on shutdown after IPv6 was enabled

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228412 --- Comment #13 from Eugene Grosbein --- I could not reproduce a panic using my 11.1-STABLE/amd64 system that has working IPv6 support and similar multiple tap interfaces: I've started /usr/bin/nohup /usr/local/bin/syncthing -no-browser >

Re: GRE/gif/netgraph tunnel speed on 10Gbit channel

Am 29.05.2018 um 13:33 schrieb Vitalij Satanivskij: MM> Can you try MTU 1400 on GRE0 and MSS of 1300 just for testing? MM> With this values I get 4600Mbit sending and 1400Mbit receiving with MM> iperf and 10 parallel streams. MM> UUUPSS looks like i have problem with metodology I'm use iperf3

Re: netstat(1) -s -f is broken

On 05/03/18 15:32, Dieter BSD wrote: > FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE > > The fine man page promises: > netstat -i | -I interface -s [-46] [-f protocol_family | -p protocol] > [-M core] [-N system] > Display per-interface statistics for each network protocol, for a >

Re: GRE/gif/netgraph tunnel speed on 10Gbit channel

Am 29.05.2018 um 13:33 schrieb Vitalij Satanivskij: AVE> AVE> So, is there no difference at all? The same bit rate with and without AVE> loaded module? Can you share your configs and parameters used for testing? KERNEL - GENERIC No additional config in src.conf make.conf, no sysct.conf or anyt

[Bug 228501] [VIMAGE JAIL] panic: negative refcount 0xfffff8002717643c (when stopping jail)

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228501 Marie Helene Kvello-Aune changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Statu

Re: GRE/gif/netgraph tunnel speed on 10Gbit channel

AVE> AVE> So, is there no difference at all? The same bit rate with and without AVE> loaded module? Can you share your configs and parameters used for testing? KERNEL - GENERIC No additional config in src.conf make.conf, no sysct.conf or anything else in configs 1) no module mtu on ixl - 15

Re: GRE/gif/netgraph tunnel speed on 10Gbit channel

On 29.05.2018 13:58, Vitalij Satanivskij wrote: > Thank you Andrey. > > I'm test with value of 62 without any success ^( So, is there no difference at all? The same bit rate with and without loaded module? Can you share your configs and parameters used for testing? -- WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov

Re: GRE/gif/netgraph tunnel speed on 10Gbit channel

Thank you Andrey. I'm test with value of 62 without any success ^( Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: AVE> On 29.05.2018 13:05, Vitalij Satanivskij wrote: AVE> > AVE> > Hello. AVE> > AVE> > Looks like it's inposible to set as sysctl are readonly and through loader.conf it's also not setable. AVE> >

Re: GRE/gif/netgraph tunnel speed on 10Gbit channel

On 29.05.2018 13:05, Vitalij Satanivskij wrote: > > Hello. > > Looks like it's inposible to set as sysctl are readonly and through > loader.conf it's also not setable. > > AVE> You can try to increase kern.ipc.max_linkhdr up to 60-80 bytes. > AVE> I think this can increase throughput a bit, sin

Re: GRE/gif/netgraph tunnel speed on 10Gbit channel

Hello. Looks like it's inposible to set as sysctl are readonly and through loader.conf it's also not setable. AVE> You can try to increase kern.ipc.max_linkhdr up to 60-80 bytes. AVE> I think this can increase throughput a bit, since this can reduce the AVE> need to allocate extra mbuf when ne

Re: GRE/gif/netgraph tunnel speed on 10Gbit channel

On 29.05.2018 10:17, Vitalij Satanivskij wrote: > Version of system - 11.2-BETA2 FreeBSD 11.2-BETA2 #0 r334027 > Also I'm test FreeBSD 11.1-PRERELEASE #6 r320593 > > Kernel GENERIC and CUSTOM (mostly cut off not used drivers from kernel) > > For testing I'm use iperf on pure 10Gbit chanel easy g

Re: 8021x on wired Ethernet

Doug Ambrisko writes: > On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 02:17:21PM +0300, Zeus Panchenko wrote: > | Bengt Ahlgren wrote: > | > Is there a standard "rc.conf" way to configure 8021x authentication on > | > wired ethernet? > | > | looks like it's to be something like: ifconfig_em0="WPA" > > Yes for exampl

GRE/gif/netgraph tunnel speed on 10Gbit channel

Hello. Trying to build a tunnel between two machines with 10Gbit network (ixl0: ) I saw that the maximum speed of the tunnel is 1.6gbit for gre/gif and arround 544-600mbit for ng0 (netgraph tunnel via TCP) Hardware is: CPU: AMD EPYC 7251 8-Core Processor FreeBSD/SMP: 2 package(s) x 8 core