https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228412
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|n...@freebsd.org
--
You are receiv
Welcome
http://youpic.com?utm_content=Email&utm_campaign=Email%20marketing&utm_source=SendGrid&utm_term=Email%20marketing&utm_medium=Email
Hello YouPic Community!
We need your help. Due to the recent tragedy in Manchester, we have decided to
bring our community together and show every day life
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221676
--- Comment #8 from Phil Shafer ---
Have fix in libxo github repo:
https://github.com/Juniper/libxo/commit/27d3021cc3cc8cfbe9ddee5930cd7a9afea8f68f#diff-5a0d468963477f7daedb8308c219dd80
I'll spin a release and import it into HEAD this aft
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227720
--- Comment #21 from Matt Allanson ---
(In reply to Matt Allanson from comment #20)
We went from 10.2-RELEASE to 11.1-RELEASE. Just wanting to clarify
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228302
--- Comment #7 from sandreas ---
Ok, i'll recheck everything again in the meantime.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227720
--- Comment #20 from Matt Allanson ---
(In reply to Eugene Grosbein from comment #18)
Apologies that is last stable in 10.2-RELEASE not 10.3-RELEASE
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
__
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228302
--- Comment #6 from Sean Bruno ---
(In reply to sandreas from comment #5)
igb0@pci0:5:0:0:class=0x02 card=0x00028086 chip=0x15338086 rev=0x03
hdr=0x00
vendor = 'Intel Corporation'
device = 'I210 Gigabit Network C
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227720
--- Comment #19 from Matt Allanson ---
(In reply to Eugene Grosbein from comment #18)
1. Install FreeBSD 11.1 (nanobsd built with provided KCONF)
2. Install stunnel
3. Configure ppp + stunnel to act as server on one machine and client on
a
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227720
--- Comment #18 from Eugene Grosbein ---
(In reply to Matt Allanson from comment #17)
It would be nice if you write in details how one can reproduce the problem.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_
On 05/21/18 13:16, Luciano Mannucci wrote:
On Fri, 18 May 2018 23:29:33 +0200
Andrea Venturoli wrote:
Does anyone have a good suggestion for a program similar to the above ones?
I require nothing fancy, I just want it to be reliable.
The oldest, the simplest, the most reliable (I'm still usin
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228302
--- Comment #5 from sandreas ---
I activated WOL in BIOS (i checked twice) and added
dev.igb.0.wake=1
dev.em.0.wake=1
in /etc/sysctl.conf. Then i ran
ifconfig igb0 wol
ifconfig em0 wol
And tried different things with and without reboo
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227720
--- Comment #17 from Matt Allanson ---
(In reply to Eugene Grosbein from comment #16)
Unfortunately it would be quite a significant change to our production
environment and we aren't able to do that "in the meantime" type fix.
--
You are
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228302
--- Comment #4 from Sean Bruno ---
(In reply to sandreas from comment #3)
There are no "WOL" flags in the ifconfig output. It doesn't look like your
devices have wake on lan active.
Here are my devices:
root@:~ # ifconfig igb0 wol
root@:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206721
--- Comment #19 from j...@pfsense.org ---
The patch is working great, thanks! I set a supersede of 0 and everything is
back to normal.
One additional question: Since the new DHCP MTU behavior will be active for
everyone, should the default
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228108
Andrey V. Elsukov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Open|Closed
Resolution|---
On Fri, 18 May 2018 23:29:33 +0200
Andrea Venturoli wrote:
> Does anyone have a good suggestion for a program similar to the above ones?
> I require nothing fancy, I just want it to be reliable.
The oldest, the simplest, the most reliable (I'm still using it, and
it shoud be in the ports):
Peter
16 matches
Mail list logo