On 13.05.2018 02:37, Andreas Scherrer wrote:
> My interpretation of [2]'s statement:
>
> "If no security association is found, the packet is put on hold and the
> IKE daemon is asked to negotiate an appropriate one."
>
> is that it should somehow be automagic. But in my current configuration,
> t
Hi
I am trying to configure a site to site VPN using the (new?) if_ipsec
interfaces [1]. One endpoint is FreeBSD 11.1-RELEASE whereas the other
will be a RPi (Raspbian 9.4 stretch running libreswan).
The public IPs involved are all IPv6 and the goal is to tunnel IPv4 traffic.
Currently I am
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228163
Eugene Grosbein changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eu...@freebsd.org
St
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228163
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|n...@freebsd.org
--
You are receiv
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228202
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||IntelNetworking, regression
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195197
--- Comment #8 from guy...@gmail.com ---
I created phabricator D15406 as my attempt
to port the NetBSD changes to 12.0-CURRENT.
Fix for 194485 is needed first.
My attempts for fixes to that bug are D15404 and D15405.
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194485
guy...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||guy...@gmail.com
--- Comment #4
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209581
Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dknuep...@online.de
--- Comment #7 from D
