[Bug 227259] accept()/poll() and shutdown()/close() - not work as in FreeBSD10, may broke many apps

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227259 --- Comment #17 from commit-h...@freebsd.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: jtl Date: Sat May 12 01:55:24 UTC 2018 New revision: 333511 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/333511 Log: r285910 attempted to make shutd

Re: Unrecognized Inifiniband HCA

On 10/05/2018 15:35, Justin Clift wrote: On 2018-05-10 10:21, Grzegorz Junka wrote: On 08/05/2018 23:41, Justin Clift wrote: That's probably a ConnectX (series 1) Mellanox card.  Those can operate in either Infiniband mode, or Ethernet mode. Which mode are you wanting it to run in? :) As

[Bug 227259] accept()/poll() and shutdown()/close() - not work as in FreeBSD10, may broke many apps

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227259 --- Comment #16 from e...@free.fr --- *** Bug 225863 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ freebsd-net@fr

Re: if_em(4) carrier loss event not recognized with i217; while 82574 does recognize

Bezüglich Harry Schmalzbauer's Nachricht vom 10.05.2018 21:17 (localtime): > Hello, > > if I pull the TP connection from my i217 Clarkville, HEAD still reports > media > 1000Base-T status "active". > > Doing the same with the other if_em(4) NIC in that box, a hartwell, > 82574LM, the status corre

Re: iflib-if_em tests with HEAD and lagg panic [Was: Re: svn commit: r333338 - in stable/11/sys: dev/bnxt kern net sys]

Bezüglich Stephen Hurd's Nachricht vom 10.05.2018 21:55 (localtime): > Ok, the review is updated with the EBR. If you can update your tree to > r333466 or newer, apply the patch and retest, that would be great. It > seems to be working here. I took out the sys/net/if.c, sys/net/if_var.h and sys/

[Bug 228108] if_ipsec drops all the icmp v4&v6 error messages

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228108 --- Comment #5 from commit-h...@freebsd.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: ae Date: Fri May 11 16:50:26 UTC 2018 New revision: 333497 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/333497 Log: Apply the change from r272770 to

Re: pf: Efficiently specifying discontinuous IPv6 ranges

On 11/05/2018 16:28, Mark Raynsford via freebsd-net wrote: good_0 = 2a00:1450:400c:: - 2a00:1450:400c::1000 good_1 = 2a04:4e42:600::200 - 2a04:4e42:600::400 good_2 = 2001:1900:2254:206a::50:0 good_3 = 2001:19f0:5:61d:f000:: good_4 = 2001:4998:58:1836::10 You could also handle this using an addr

[Bug 228108] if_ipsec drops all the icmp v4&v6 error messages

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228108 --- Comment #4 from bugs.freebsd@mx.zzux.com --- Thank you! I was applied this patch and it seems to be ok. icmpv6&v4 errors via if_ipsec: 1240 bytes from 2a02:::::451a:5763: Packet too big mtu = 1480 36 bytes from 192.168.2

Re: pf: Efficiently specifying discontinuous IPv6 ranges

> Hello. > > Let's say I have a host and I want to restrict access to that host to a > discontinuous range of IPv6 addresses. For example, let's say I want to > allow access to a host from addresses [2a00:1450:400c::, > 2a00:1450:400c::1000], [2a04:4e42:600::200, 2a04:4e42:600::400], and > individ

pf: Efficiently specifying discontinuous IPv6 ranges

Hello. Let's say I have a host and I want to restrict access to that host to a discontinuous range of IPv6 addresses. For example, let's say I want to allow access to a host from addresses [2a00:1450:400c::, 2a00:1450:400c::1000], [2a04:4e42:600::200, 2a04:4e42:600::400], and individually 2001:190

RE: kernel: in6_delayed_cksum: delayed m_pullup

>> From: Dries Michiels >> Sent: donderdag 10 mei 2018 17:43 >> To: 'Andrey V. Elsukov' ; freebsd-net@freebsd.org >> Subject: RE: kernel: in6_delayed_cksum: delayed m_pullup >> > Also, can you try this patch? > > > > -- > > WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov > > Ok error has returned: > May 10 17:31:39 va

[Bug 227259] accept()/poll() and shutdown()/close() - not work as in FreeBSD10, may broke many apps

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227259 Kubilay Kocak changed: What|Removed |Added URL|jtl | -- You are receiving this mail b

[Bug 227259] accept()/poll() and shutdown()/close() - not work as in FreeBSD10, may broke many apps

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227259 --- Comment #15 from Kubilay Kocak --- If bug 225863 and this issue are two symptoms of the same underlying cause, fixed by either of the two commits (reviews) referenced here, we should close one of the issue reports. In this case this is

[Bug 227259] accept()/poll() and shutdown()/close() - not work as in FreeBSD10, may broke many apps

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227259 --- Comment #14 from e...@free.fr --- Hi 11.2-PRERELEASE : https://reviews.freebsd.org/D15021 seems to fix https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225863 Freeswitch now shuts down properly. Regards Éric Masson -- You are rece

[Bug 227259] accept()/poll() and shutdown()/close() - not work as in FreeBSD10, may broke many apps

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227259 Kubilay Kocak changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://reviews.freebsd.org

[Bug 228108] if_ipsec drops all the icmp v4&v6 error messages

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228108 --- Comment #3 from Andrey V. Elsukov --- Created attachment 193277 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=193277&action=edit Proposed patch Can you try this patch? You need to rebuild the kernel. -- You are receiving

[Bug 228108] if_ipsec drops all the icmp v4&v6 error messages

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228108 Andrey V. Elsukov changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.freebsd.org/bu