Am 21.04.2018 um 01:45 schrieb Kevin Bowling:
These are all pretty much known (to intel and NF/LLNW) issues with the
ixl driver. If you must run 11.1 you are best off just buying a
chelsio T580.
If you can run HEAD, or perhaps an eventual 11.3 MFC,
https://github.com/intel-wired-ethernet/freebs
These are all pretty much known (to intel and NF/LLNW) issues with the
ixl driver. If you must run 11.1 you are best off just buying a
chelsio T580.
If you can run HEAD, or perhaps an eventual 11.3 MFC,
https://github.com/intel-wired-ethernet/freebsd/tree/ixl-iflib may fix
this but there are a fe
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227654
--- Comment #2 from Eugene Grosbein ---
Created attachment 192690
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=192690&action=edit
debugging patch for single user only
Forgot to note that my kernel has VIMAGE too.
I've reprodu
I don't know if this post is helpful, but just in case:
http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?04125f40-6388-f074-d935-ce6c16d220fa
Hope you don't mind a top post, rick
From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org on behalf
of hiren panchasara
Sent: Friday, April 2
On 04/20/18 at 12:03P, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> I'm commissioning a new NFS server with an Intel dual-40G XL710
> interface, running 11.1. I have a few other servers with this
> adapter, although not running 40G, and they work fine so long as you
> disable TSO. This one ... not so much. On the r
> On 19. Apr 2018, at 00:07, Rainer Duffner wrote:
>
>
>
>> Am 17.04.2018 um 06:45 schrieb Niels Kobschätzki :
>>
>> solved now finally my problem after two weeks and it wasn't the NFS. I
>> just got derailed from the real solution again and again from some
>> people, thus I didn't look in t
Hello
I would like to get some help regarding a little problem i am facing. I
create bridge0 and assign 2 interfaces igb6 and igb7 to it. Connecting 2
systems to these ports and they are able to ping each other (both of
10.10.10.0/24 series for testing).
Next i create vlan_igb5 with parent interfac
On 25/3/18 12:21 am, Grzegorz Junka wrote:
Hi,
In my laptop I have both, wlan0 and ue0 (ethernet). When both are
connected, FreeBSD chooses to use wlan0 by default. Only when I
disable wlan0 it switches to use ue0. Since ue0 is ethernet it's
obviously much faster than wlan0.
It's decided by
On 20.04.2018 18:48, Victor Gamov wrote:
> More correct problem is: last configured ipsec interface tx/rx traffic
> only. For my example:
>
> - ping from 10.10.98.1 to 10.10.98.2 via ipsec30 is OK
>
> - ping from 10.10.98.2 to 10.10.98.1 via ipsec30 is OK
>
> - ping from 10.10.98.5 (Cisco) to
On 20/04/2018 13:04, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
On 20.04.2018 11:17, Victor Gamov wrote:
All local SA configured and established and remote side (Cisco routers)
report SA established too.
But traffic goes via only one ipsec-interface.
If you have all SAs established, you probably need to check
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227654
--- Comment #1 from Eugene Grosbein ---
$ addr2line -e kernel.debug -i -f -C 806fe6ac
ether_output_frame
/data2/src/sys/net/if_ethersubr.c:449
ether_output
/data2/src/sys/net/if_ethersubr.c:435
(kgdb) l /data2/src/sys/net/if_ethe
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227654
Bug ID: 227654
Summary: [panic] repeatable crash with IPv6+lagg+vlan+em
Product: Base System
Version: 11.1-STABLE
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
On 20.04.2018 11:17, Victor Gamov wrote:
> All local SA configured and established and remote side (Cisco routers)
> report SA established too.
>
> But traffic goes via only one ipsec-interface.
If you have all SAs established, you probably need to check your routing
configuration. Or at least te
Hi All
I have FreeBSD box (11.1-STABLE FreeBSD 11.1-STABLE #0 r327786) and
simple configuration with two if_ipsec configured like
=
ipsec25: flags=8051 metric 0 mtu 1400
description: -so: Sofy
tunnel inet IP-FreeBSD --> IP-Cisco-RTR-1
inet 10.10.98.6 --> 10.10.98.5
14 matches
Mail list logo
