Re: Support for Dual NIC

Am 07.04.2018 um 20:15 schrieb Ralston Champagnie: Hello Guys, Netmap natively support only the four ports NIC doesn't make sense when considering that dual NIC has the same exact chipset as the quad ones... Is there a patch available? Noticed problems with pictures or videos such as this with

Support for Dual NIC

Hello Guys, Netmap natively support only the four ports NIC doesn't make sense when considering that dual NIC has the same exact chipset as the quad ones... Is there a patch available? Noticed problems with pictures or videos such as this with the dual (mine: Intel 82575) and IPS with lots of mem

[Bug 227259] accept()/poll() and shutdown()/close() - not work as in FreeBSD10, may broke many apps

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227259 --- Comment #10 from rozhuk...@gmail.com --- IMHO: - shutdown() and close() should wakes up all thread on all descriptors that wait blocking i/o. - shutdown() should generate EOF for all syscals: read()/recv/write()/send()/accept()/poll()/

Re[2]: Questions about ipfw's dynamic rules' dyn_keepalive

--- Original Message --- From: "Andrea Venturoli" Date: 7 April 2018, 17:19:00 > On 04/03/18 12:54, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: > > On 03.04.2018 13:45, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: > >>> Can anybody give any hint about the above behaviours or point me to good > >>> documentation? The man pages

Re: Questions about ipfw's dynamic rules' dyn_keepalive

On 04/03/18 12:54, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: On 03.04.2018 13:45, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: Can anybody give any hint about the above behaviours or point me to good documentation? The man pages is very brief on this, unfortunately. Hi, Thanks for your answer. ipfw uses M_SKIP_FIREWALL flag