[Bug 227259] accept()/poll() and shutdown()/close() - not work as in FreeBSD10, may broke many apps

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227259 --- Comment #7 from rozhuk...@gmail.com --- DragonFly 5.0-RELEASE DragonFly v5.0.2-RELEASE #4: Sun Dec 3 17:42:25 EST 2017 ./acc_test | grep "chk OK" 0: socket(AF_INET, block) ... lskt accept shutdown chk OK, ret code: 53 - Softw

[Bug 227259] accept()/poll() and shutdown()/close() - not work as in FreeBSD10, may broke many apps

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227259 rozhuk...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #192208|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug 227259] accept()/poll() and shutdown()/close() - not work as in FreeBSD10, may broke many apps

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227259 --- Comment #5 from rozhuk...@gmail.com --- FreeBSD rimwks 11.1-STABLE FreeBSD 11.1-STABLE r331113M amd64 I do not try 12. You can run test from attach and see results. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for t

[Bug 227303] TCP: huge cwnd does not slowly decay while app/rwnd limited, interacts badly with rwnd autosize

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227303 --- Comment #4 from Hiren Panchasara --- IIRC, Netflix has new-cwv implemented in their not-yet-upstreamed codebase. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___

[Bug 227259] accept()/poll() and shutdown()/close() - not work as in FreeBSD10, may broke many apps

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227259 --- Comment #4 from Gleb Smirnoff --- Can you please confirm that behavior changed for FreeBSD 11, not 12? I would expect to have a regression in 12, since there was a big change to listening sockets there, but not in 11. -- You are recei

[Bug 227303] TCP: huge cwnd does not slowly decay while app/rwnd limited, interacts badly with rwnd autosize

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227303 Richard Scheffenegger changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|tcp cwnd grows without |TCP: huge cwnd does not

[Bug 227303] tcp cwnd grows without bounds while app/rwnd limited, interacts badly with rwnd autosize

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227303 --- Comment #3 from Richard Scheffenegger --- Immediately clamping cwnd down to rwnd is not a viable solution, as TCP flow control might be in actual use by the client (dynamically adjusting rwnd within <10 RTTs, depending on processing sta

[Bug 227303] tcp cwnd grows without bounds while app/rwnd limited, interacts badly with rwnd autosize

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227303 --- Comment #2 from Richard Scheffenegger --- After further investigation, this issue is more complex. cwnd does in fact not grow when the transmission is rwnd limited. However, 20 sec prior to these two burst events, during slow start, the

[Bug 227303] tcp cwnd grows without bounds while app/rwnd limited, interacts badly with rwnd autosize

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227303 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|freebsd-b...@freebsd.org|freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org -- You are

Re: Same host or different? How can you tell "over the wire"?

On 22/3/18 7:30 am, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: In message <5ab2d11a.6060...@grosbein.net>, Eugene Grosbein wrote: If they respond truly identically, there are no reasons to treat them like distinct hosts despite of different IP addresses. are you on the same segment as them?

Re: Raw Sockets: Two Questions

05.04.2018 16:53, Julian Elischer wrote: > why not just use the ng-pppoe node? :-) Well, I do not need full-blown pppoe session nor interface configuration, only send thousands oe broadcasts then collect all replies, period. Low-overhead solution is preferred. ___

Re: Raw Sockets: Two Questions

On 22/3/18 3:08 am, Eugene Grosbein wrote: 22.03.2018 1:08, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: OK, so, if I have understood all that has been said in this thread so far, then I would assert that, from the perspective of a simple-minded and naive end user (e.g. me), the assertion that I originally quote

[Bug 227259] accept()/poll() and shutdown()/close() - not work as in FreeBSD10, may broke many apps

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227259 rozhuk...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Version|11.0-STABLE |11.1-STABLE -- You are recei