Re: netmap: How the buf_num of buffers is used by driver and monitor app

Hi, 2018-03-30 6:00 GMT+02:00 Ming Fu : > Hi, > > I am wondering about the netmap module parameters buf_num. The default > buf_num 163840 seems fairly big compare to intel 10G ixgbe of max 4096 > queue size. A full queue of the interface can only use a very small portion > of the buf_num. Can th

Re: Default network device

Bezüglich Grzegorz Junka's Nachricht vom 24.03.2018 17:21 (localtime): > Hi, > > In my laptop I have both, wlan0 and ue0 (ethernet). When both are > connected, FreeBSD chooses to use wlan0 by default. Only when I > disable wlan0 it switches to use ue0. Since ue0 is ethernet it's > obviously much f

[Bug 221317] Netmap issue after ixgbe driver update in r320897

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221317 --- Comment #17 from Sylvain Galliano --- (In reply to Cassiano Peixoto from comment #15) Hello Cassiano, can you try to recompile kernel using attached patch. It add a 1s delay before stopping ixgbe interface (i.e. ifconfig down or netma

[Bug 221317] Netmap issue after ixgbe driver update in r320897

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221317 --- Comment #16 from Sylvain Galliano --- Created attachment 191979 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=191979&action=edit Patch to add a 1s delay before stopping ixgbe interface (no carrier issue on stable) -- You a

[Bug 227086] Upgraded world - broken OpenVPN second tun - ifconfig: ioctl (SIOCAIFADDR): File exists

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227086 Marek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |Not A Bug Status|Open

[Bug 195197] [netinet6] ipv6 prefix not renewed when managed by userspace daemon with pltime and vltime

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195197 --- Comment #4 from guy...@gmail.com --- There is an additional problem that SIOCSPFXFLUSH_IN6 will trigger a KASSERT in nd6_prefix_del "prefix %p has referencing addresses" when kernel is built with INVARIANTS and you add a static address b

[Bug 195197] [patch] [netinet6] ipv6 prefix lifetime is not updated for existing address updated through SIOCAIFADDR_IN6

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195197 guy...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #149620|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug 195197] [netinet6] ipv6 prefix not renewed when managed by userspace daemon with pltime and vltime

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195197 guy...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[patch] [netinet6] ipv6 |[netinet6] ipv6 prefix not

[Bug 195197] [patch] [netinet6] ipv6 prefix lifetime is not updated for existing address updated through SIOCAIFADDR_IN6

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195197 guy...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #149617|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug 195197] [patch] [netinet6] ipv6 prefix lifetime is not updated for existing address updated through SIOCAIFADDR_IN6

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195197 guy...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #149619|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug 227086] Upgraded world - broken OpenVPN second tun - ifconfig: ioctl (SIOCAIFADDR): File exists

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227086 --- Comment #3 from Eugene Grosbein --- (In reply to Marek from comment #2) The problem is the address 10.20.20.1 that is bounded first to "local system" by means of assigning it to local side of tun0. Then, an attempt is made to assign it

[Bug 223835] BGP session not established with md5 password via FRRouting

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223835 --- Comment #37 from Alexey --- (In reply to Andrey V. Elsukov from comment #19) Hello. Today I was able to update and test everything. Everything is working fine. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug