https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227058
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|freebsd-b...@freebsd.org|freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
--
You are
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221919
--- Comment #14 from Jason Tubnor ---
Has the Intel driver been upstreamed yet to make the 11.2-RELEASE? re@ have
just sent a reminder of the release schedule. If the updated vendor driver
works for others here that run their own build ser
> On a single-client basis the fastest rates we see are around 5 Gbps.
> Hitting this server from multiple boxes we see peaks of 20 Gbps at the very
> highest. More frequently things top off around 13 Gbps. These numbers are
> coming from iperf tests. We are seeing similar numbers with direct
>
As would I.
Christian
On Mar 28, 2018, at 9:38 AM, Rodney W. Grimes
wrote:
>>> Am 28.03.2018 um 06:11 schrieb christian russell:
>>> I am having trouble getting an Intel XL710-DA2 NIC to get even close to
>>> line rate. It is a 4x10 Gbps card. The box is running FreeBSD 11 (FreeNAS
>>> in
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 09:16:23AM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 04:56:32PM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > > > I have posted a revision which removes support for token-ring networking
> > > > from the tree. There have been no such devices for some time.
> > > >
>
> Am 28.03.2018 um 06:11 schrieb christian russell:
> > I am having trouble getting an Intel XL710-DA2 NIC to get even close to
> > line rate. It is a 4x10 Gbps card. The box is running FreeBSD 11 (FreeNAS
> > in particular).
> >
> > We have tried both 1.7 and 1.9 driver revisions with similar re
Am 28.03.2018 um 06:11 schrieb christian russell:
I am having trouble getting an Intel XL710-DA2 NIC to get even close to
line rate. It is a 4x10 Gbps card. The box is running FreeBSD 11 (FreeNAS
in particular).
We have tried both 1.7 and 1.9 driver revisions with similar results. The
NVM ver
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227033
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|freebsd-b...@freebsd.org|freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
--
You are
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 04:56:32PM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > > I have posted a revision which removes support for token-ring networking
> > > from the tree. There have been no such devices for some time.
> > >
> > > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D14875
> > >
> >
> > Arcnet coming soon?
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 04:56:32PM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > I have posted a revision which removes support for token-ring networking
> > from the tree. There have been no such devices for some time.
> >
> > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D14875
> >
>
> Arcnet coming soon?
> and probably
Hi,
You need to increase the value of some netmap module parameter. At least
ring_size, maybe also buf_num. Then restart your netmap applications.
Keep in mind that performance could worsen with more slots, because of
increased cache thrashing.
Cheers,
Vincenzo
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018, 3:50 PM
Hi,
I was trying netmap on a Linux box with 128G of ram (64G per numa node). If I
set ixgbe interface to 4096 ring size, the nm_open will fail with error "Cannot
allocate memory". What can I tweak to make the card use larger ring size? The
following test was run after fresh reboot.
$ ethtool -
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216460
tanu_l...@yahoo.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tanu_l...@yahoo.com
--- Comme
On 23.03.2018 20:07, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Just to keep things up to date; I had a chat with people on IRC.
>
> * I got the regression suite in github compiling and running on amd64.
> I'm going to attempt to commit some makefile hilarity to get it to
> cross-compile against the copy in s
14 matches
Mail list logo
