https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223835
--- Comment #35 from Andrey V. Elsukov ---
Created attachment 191795
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=191795&action=edit
patch to net/openbgpd port
I looked at the openbgpd code from ports. Port has wrong patch, be
In message <201803241747.w2ohlupr069...@donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net>,
Jamie Landeg-Jones wrote:
>Have you thought of examining the TCP timestamp field? Not necessarily
>for accurate uptime, but a way to determine if the hosts are the same.
No, I certainly didn't, but that appears to be the ex
Have you thought of examining the TCP timestamp field? Not necessarily for
accurate uptime, but a way to determine if the hosts are the same.
Or some of the other fingerprinting methods? nmap has options for uptime and
other fingerprinting : https://nmap.org/book/osdetect-usage.html
Of course,
Hi,
In my laptop I have both, wlan0 and ue0 (ethernet). When both are
connected, FreeBSD chooses to use wlan0 by default. Only when I disable
wlan0 it switches to use ue0. Since ue0 is ethernet it's obviously much
faster than wlan0.
Why FreeBSD is selecting wlan rather than ue? How to config
