https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226144
Eugene Grosbein changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eu...@freebsd.org
--- Comment #2
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226217
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|freebsd-b...@freebsd.org|freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
--
You are
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193953
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226144
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|freebsd-b...@freebsd.org|freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
K
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223835
--- Comment #33 from Felipe N. Oliva ---
(In reply to Andrey V. Elsukov from comment #32)
pfSense with problem too.
https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/7969
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223835
--- Comment #32 from Andrey V. Elsukov ---
(In reply to Felipe N. Oliva from comment #31)
> (In reply to Andrey V. Elsukov from comment #30)
> I will try with TSO/LRO.
> Interface: ix (intel 10g)
> Doesn't work with ipv4 and ipv6.
>
> nets
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223835
--- Comment #31 from Felipe N. Oliva ---
(In reply to Andrey V. Elsukov from comment #30)
I will try with TSO/LRO.
Interface: ix (intel 10g)
Doesn't work with ipv4 and ipv6.
netstat -sp tcp | grep sig
0 packets with matching signat
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223835
--- Comment #30 from Andrey V. Elsukov ---
(In reply to Felipe N. Oliva from comment #29)
> (In reply to Andrey V. Elsukov from comment #28)
> Yes, here is 11.1-STABLE r329758.
>
> interface:
> vlan1977: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu
> 1500
>
On 27.02.2018 14:20, Harry Schmalzbauer wrote:
> Thank you very much for your explanation!
>
> Unfortunately, I couldn't get the P2P idea behind if_ipsec(4) and I
> tought I'd just need a few minutes to switch from policy based tunnels
> to route based – local brain contraints seem to require me m
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223835
--- Comment #29 from Felipe N. Oliva ---
(In reply to Andrey V. Elsukov from comment #28)
Yes, here is 11.1-STABLE r329758.
interface:
vlan1977: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500
options=600703
kernel:
options IPSEC
options TCP_SIGNATU
Bezüglich Andrey V. Elsukov's Nachricht vom 27.02.2018 11:50 (localtime):
> On 27.02.2018 12:56, Harry Schmalzbauer wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm out of ideas how to quick-start with if_ipsec(4) and IKEv1.
>>
>> I'm familar with security/ipsec-tools, but I couldn't find out how
>> racoon(8) would int
On 27.02.2018 12:56, Harry Schmalzbauer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm out of ideas how to quick-start with if_ipsec(4) and IKEv1.
>
> I'm familar with security/ipsec-tools, but I couldn't find out how
> racoon(8) would interact with cloned if_ipsec(4) interfaces yet.
You need to manually configure if
Bezüglich Harry Schmalzbauer's Nachricht vom 27.02.2018 10:56 (localtime):
> Hello,
>
> I'm out of ideas how to quick-start with if_ipsec(4) and IKEv1.
>
> I'm familar with security/ipsec-tools, but I couldn't find out how
> racoon(8) would interact with cloned if_ipsec(4) interfaces yet.
>
> Als
Hello,
I'm out of ideas how to quick-start with if_ipsec(4) and IKEv1.
I'm familar with security/ipsec-tools, but I couldn't find out how
racoon(8) would interact with cloned if_ipsec(4) interfaces yet.
Also, how to tell racoon(8) to generate such tunnel interfaces, hence
policies?
I guess the
14 matches
Mail list logo
