https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224116
--- Comment #17 from Eugene Grosbein ---
(In reply to Eric Joyner from comment #16)
Our if_bridge(4) implementation uses promiscuous mode, so fixing multicast
promiscuous setting should be enough without growing of multicast filtering
list
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224116
Eugene Grosbein changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|STP Frames are ignored |[ixl] STP Frames are
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224116
--- Comment #16 from Eric Joyner ---
We identified a bug in ixl(4) where multicast frames weren't being received in
tcpdump because the driver wasn't setting a multicast promiscuous setting
correctly. The fix (along with other updates) shou
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224116
--- Comment #15 from Michael Neese ---
Just to be clear: There is traffic on the interface, for example cdp from the
switch to the firewall and back
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224116
--- Comment #14 from Michael Neese ---
Created attachment 188567
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=188567&action=edit
ifconfig_2017_12_05-22_34
Same test as above, no bpdu frames. Attached again output from ifconfig
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224116
--- Comment #13 from Eugene Grosbein ---
(In reply to Michael Neese from comment #12)
This time there is no PROMISC flag on the ixl0, this could be a reason you
don't see incoming STP BPDU. For test, use "ifconfig ixl0 promisc" to make sur
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224116
--- Comment #12 from Michael Neese ---
Created attachment 188566
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=188566&action=edit
ifconfig_2017_12_05-22_02
I copied the ifconfig output as the port was still deactivated on switc
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224116
--- Comment #11 from Eugene Grosbein ---
(In reply to Michael Neese from comment #10)
ifconfig still shows "no carrier" for ixl0. No established link - no incoming
frames.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224116
--- Comment #10 from Michael Neese ---
ixl1 is deactivated on switch side. ixl0 is active, on switch and the firewall
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
__
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224116
--- Comment #9 from Eugene Grosbein ---
(In reply to Michael Neese from comment #8)
Why your "ifconfig" output shows "status: no carrier" for ixl interfaces?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224116
--- Comment #8 from Michael Neese ---
Created attachment 188565
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=188565&action=edit
ifconfig
It's installed on a physical machine, no vm.
I did as you asked, removed ixl0 from the br
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224116
--- Comment #7 from Eugene Grosbein ---
Also, do you use this in some virtualized environment? ixl(4) does not really
support PROMISC mode in such case, so it should not be used as bridge port when
running FreeBSD as guest system.
--
You
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224116
Eugene Grosbein changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|New |Open
CC|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224116
--- Comment #5 from Michael Neese ---
None of the STP Multicast addresses is there...the correct addresses are:
01:80:C2:00:00:00 STP
01:00:0C:CC:CC:CD Per VLAN STP
01:80:C2:00:00:08 VLAN in VLAN STP
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224116
--- Comment #4 from Michael Neese ---
sysctl dev.ixl.0.debug.filter_list
dev.ixl.0.debug.filter_list:
01:00:0c:cc:cc:cc, vlan -1, flags 0x0011
33:33:91:ee:46:17, vlan -1, flags 0x0011
33:33:ff:91:ee:46, vlan -1, flags 0x0011
33:33:00:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224116
Eric Joyner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||e...@freebsd.org
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224116
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|freebsd-b...@freebsd.org|freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
--
You are
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224019
Julian Elischer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|Open
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224019
--- Comment #4 from Julian Elischer ---
applied to stable/10
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.free
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224019
--- Comment #3 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: julian
Date: Tue Dec 5 14:46:12 UTC 2017
New revision: 326568
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/326568
Log:
Steps to Reproduce:
#ngctl
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224019
--- Comment #2 from Julian Elischer ---
r309408 introduced an API change in 10 so couldn't go in
I will make this simpler correction now
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197198
Patrick McGleenon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||patrick.mcgleenon@owmobilit
22 matches
Mail list logo
