Re: OpenVPN vs IPSec

2017-11-18 Thread Jim Thompson
Performance is better with IPsec. It’s a standard, too. > On Nov 18, 2017, at 10:58 AM, Victor Sudakov wrote: > > Dear Colleagues, > > Is there any reason to prefer IPSec over OpenVPN for building VPNs > between FreeBSD hosts and routers (and others compatible with OpenVPN > like pfSense, Ope

Re: OpenVPN vs IPSec

2017-11-18 Thread Muenz, Michael
Am 18.11.2017 um 17:58 schrieb Victor Sudakov: Dear Colleagues, Is there any reason to prefer IPSec over OpenVPN for building VPNs between FreeBSD hosts and routers (and others compatible with OpenVPN like pfSense, OpenWRT etc)? I can see only advantages of OpenVPN (a single UDP port, a single

Re: OpenVPN vs IPSec

2017-11-18 Thread Eugene Grosbein
18.11.2017 23:58, Victor Sudakov wrote: > Is there any reason to prefer IPSec over OpenVPN for building VPNs > between FreeBSD hosts and routers (and others compatible with OpenVPN > like pfSense, OpenWRT etc)? > > I can see only advantages of OpenVPN (a single UDP port, a single > userland daemo

OpenVPN vs IPSec

2017-11-18 Thread Victor Sudakov
Dear Colleagues, Is there any reason to prefer IPSec over OpenVPN for building VPNs between FreeBSD hosts and routers (and others compatible with OpenVPN like pfSense, OpenWRT etc)? I can see only advantages of OpenVPN (a single UDP port, a single userland daemon, no kernel rebuild required, a st

[Bug 222314] ifconfig epair create panics the kernel (arm64)

2017-11-18 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222314 Ed Maste changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.freebsd.org/bu