On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 2:46 PM, DES <3...@inx.su> wrote:
> Hello FreeBSD-Net,
>
> does anybody remember, around year 2004, there was a software application
> available (either as port, or package). Unfortunately I do not recall the
> application name and I'm not able to find it again, although I'v
On Thu, 02 Nov 2017 00:46:25 +0300 DES <3...@inx.su> wrote:
DES writes:
> Hello FreeBSD-Net,
>
> does anybody remember, around year 2004, there was a software
> application available (either as port, or package). Unfortunately I do
> not recall the application name and I'm not able to find it ag
Hello FreeBSD-Net,
does anybody remember, around year 2004, there was a software
application available (either as port, or package). Unfortunately I do
not recall the application name and I'm not able to find it again,
although I've reviewed the Ports collection from year 2005 which I have
on
Now 11-STABLE (and 12-CURRENT too) have this:
sys/netinet/udp_usrreq.c:#define UDBHASHSIZE 128
Looks like such low value could lead to 100% consumption of CPU by
interrupt threads (igb queues in my case) on heavy incoming UDP traffic
(torrents with uTP in my case).
My system (E3-1220v3
Hello.
As per subject, I'm building a new box which must host a jail running a
Samba AD, but I have trouble provisioning it.
Currently I'm trying samba44.
I read a lot of material and I think I understand the problem: it seems
the "samba-tool provision" script is incompatible with NFSv4ACL us
On 31.10.2017 19:40, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>> can you show your nat rules?
>
> Sure, igb0 is outside, igb1 is inside, the external IP
> address is 100.2.39.101/24, the internal is 192.168.1.1/24.
> The machine is the DNS server for the inside network and
> does not NAT DNS traffic (makes thousand
