It's possible to bypass this by unloading and reloading the patched network
driver
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 12:39 AM, Vincenzo Maffione
wrote:
> Hi,
> It is an expected behaviour that you cannot open eth4 and eth5 if they
> are bond, as the device are being used by the lagg pseudo-driver.
> Sin
Hi,
It is an expected behaviour that you cannot open eth4 and eth5 if they
are bond, as the device are being used by the lagg pseudo-driver.
Since this driver does not have netmap support for the moment being, there
is no way you can get the native mode performance if you use lagg.
If you just n
Hi all,
I have a bonded interface bond0 which enslaves eth4 and eth5. When trying
to open the devices eth4 or eth5 via netmap, I get a "device in use" error.
Opening the bond0 interface directly in netmap works, however it is in
emulated mode (as expected of a pseudointerface)
What is the idiomat
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95267
Josh Paetzel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |Overcome By Events
Statu
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186114
--- Comment #92 from Cassiano Peixoto ---
(In reply to Konstantin Belousov from comment #91)
Did you read everything on my comment #83? Everything you asked on comment #52
is there. Or am i missed something?
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186114
--- Comment #91 from Konstantin Belousov ---
(In reply to Cassiano Peixoto from comment #89)
See comment #52 for instructions.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186114
--- Comment #90 from Cassiano Peixoto ---
(In reply to Eugene Grosbein from comment #87)
Eugene,
Sorry my delay but i was updating to 11.1-BETA3 r320450M.
On updated i've applied the following patches:
- libc/stdio from https://reviews.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186114
--- Comment #89 from Cassiano Peixoto ---
(In reply to Konstantin Belousov from comment #88)
Hi Konstantin,
rtld patch has been applied since them as i said on comment #67. Do you need
some additional debug info from core file?
--
You ar
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186114
--- Comment #88 from Konstantin Belousov ---
(In reply to Eugene Grosbein from comment #84)
I very much doubt that the rtld lock leak (?) can be caused by stdio bugs.
In other words, apply the debugging rtld patch I posted 06-16, and follo
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186114
--- Comment #87 from Eugene Grosbein ---
(In reply to Cassiano Peixoto from comment #85)
And there is no need to apply "syslog" patch to 11-STABLE as it has already
been merged.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC l
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186114
--- Comment #86 from Eugene Grosbein ---
(In reply to Cassiano Peixoto from comment #85)
Yes, that would be easiest thing. All these patches apply to 11-STABLE just
fine.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186114
--- Comment #85 from Cassiano Peixoto ---
(In reply to Eugene Grosbein from comment #84)
Hi Eugene,
Don't worry, no problem.
I tried to apply Konstantin patch but i had some rejects:
# cat lib/libc/stdio/fgets.c.rej
@@ -53,17 +53,17 @@
12 matches
Mail list logo
