tsoome added a comment.
In https://reviews.freebsd.org/D10485#218907, @kczekirda wrote:
> Until I go forward with your comments about the code I want to highlight
it's not possible to support option 150, because we have to ask DHCP server for
this option. PXE client (I mean network card
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213115
Andrey V. Elsukov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||a...@freebsd.org
Resol
On 28.04.2017 10:12, Boris Astardzhiev wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've noticed that there are no lle events on ifnet and inet removals - head,
> stable11, releng11. This may confuse consumers and could make their
> application out of sync.
Maybe it would be better to not produce possible thousands of ev
rgrimes added a comment.
The more I look at PXE and DHCP the sicker I get. Your right, a client well
not normally request option 150, for that matter I am not sure it well request
66 either, though I suspect many do, and probably many of them also wrongly
interpret that as a dotted quad whe
kczekirda added a reviewer: jhb.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D10485
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: kczekirda, bapt, oshogbo, tsoome, sbruno, #network, freebsd-net-list, imp,
jhb
Cc: rgrimes, garga, ler, asomers
kczekirda added a comment.
Until I go forward with your comments about the code I want to highlight it's
not possible to support option 150, because we have to ask DHCP server for this
option. PXE client (I mean network card firmware) never asks about option 150.
I can't see any chance to us
Hi,
Are there any plans XDP (eXpress Data Path) supported on FreeBSD ?
Thanks
David S.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 12:47:51AM +0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> > On 28/4/17 2:00 am, Brooks Davis wrote:
> > > As previous threatened, I've removed support for NATM (as well as a
> > > remarkable number of remnants of the old ATM framework). One piece
> > > th
On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 12:47:51AM +0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 28/4/17 2:00 am, Brooks Davis wrote:
> > As previous threatened, I've removed support for NATM (as well as a
> > remarkable number of remnants of the old ATM framework). One piece
> > that still remains is the ngatm framework in
