https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=148807
--- Comment #43 from Kubilay Kocak ---
@All For issues where the 'described problem' and the 'thing(s) that need to be
changed' are not one and the same, to retain all history/contextual information
and not cause confusion (renaming titles,
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173444
--- Comment #13 from ma...@isc.org ---
(In reply to Andrey V. Elsukov from comment #11)
Read the words "effective MTU" that I quoted. The "effective MTU" is 1280 with
this option set.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the a
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173444
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #129462|application/octet-stream|text/plain
mime type|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173444
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #129461|0 |1
is patch|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173444
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[socket] [patch]|socket: IPV6_USE_MIN_MTU
Michael Sierchio wrote:
> I use different FIBs in the ipfw ruleset to accomplish policy based
> routing, including via a tun interface.
I've just found out that even when tun0 is in fib 0, you can use it as
a gateway from a different fib, and it works:
root@km:~ # netstat -rn -4 -F1
Routing table
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173444
--- Comment #12 from Andrey V. Elsukov ---
(In reply to marka from comment #10)
> (In reply to Andrey V. Elsukov from comment #8)
> So what! Most DNS/TCP response is a few of packets. What does it
> matter if it is the 3 or 4 packets.
Zo
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173444
--- Comment #11 from Andrey V. Elsukov ---
(In reply to marka from comment #9)
> (In reply to Andrey V. Elsukov from comment #7)
> RFC 6691
>
> o As a result, when the effective MTU of an interface varies, TCP
>SHOULD use the smallest
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173444
--- Comment #10 from ma...@isc.org ---
(In reply to Andrey V. Elsukov from comment #8)
So what! Most DNS/TCP response is a few of packets. What does it
matter if it is the 3 or 4 packets.
What matters is avoiding PMTUD as it is NOT reliab
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173444
--- Comment #9 from ma...@isc.org ---
(In reply to Andrey V. Elsukov from comment #7)
RFC 6691
o As a result, when the effective MTU of an interface varies, TCP
SHOULD use the smallest effective MTU of the interface to calculate
the
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173444
--- Comment #8 from Andrey V. Elsukov ---
And this is what always pisses me off. If we have 10/50/100G link with 9k MTU,
bind always does IPv6 fragmentation due to this option.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173444
Andrey V. Elsukov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||a...@freebsd.org
--- Comment #
I use different FIBs in the ipfw ruleset to accomplish policy based
routing, including via a tun interface.
- M
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 9:24 AM, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
> On 03/30/17 09:46, Victor Sudakov wrote:
>
> Will "ipfw fwd" do the trick? I could "ipfw fwd" the packets into the
>> tun0 i
On 03/30/17 09:46, Victor Sudakov wrote:
Will "ipfw fwd" do the trick? I could "ipfw fwd" the packets into the
tun0 interface, but will OpenVPN understand that?
Never tried this, sorry.
bye
av.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https
Hello,
I am Barr Kong Khemara, I humbly ask if you are related to my client who died
couple of
years ago in a car accident here in my country Cambodia. I wish to also inquire
if
it is possible to have different families with the same last name as yours by
coincidence
who do not share the same co
Hi,
Hope you had a chance to review my previous email. Please let me know if
you would be interested in reviewing a sample of your target audience.
Thank you, hope to hear from you.
Thanks & regards,
*Deborah Perry*
Marketing Analyst
__
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173444
--- Comment #6 from ma...@isc.org ---
(In reply to Hiren Panchasara from comment #5)
My test system died years ago but I believe that it still is a problem.
It should be trivial to check.
create a IPv6 TCP socket.
set IPV6_USE_MIN_MTU=1 us
Andrea Venturoli wrote:
> >
> > Anyone experienced with OpenVPN on FreeBSD?
> >
> > What would be the best way to policy route a network into OpenVPN? A
> > routing decision must be based on the src IP address, not the dst IP
> > address.
> >
> > Imagine an OpenVPN client with 3 interfaces: fxp0
On 03/30/17 05:22, Victor Sudakov wrote:
Dear Colleagues,
Anyone experienced with OpenVPN on FreeBSD?
What would be the best way to policy route a network into OpenVPN? A
routing decision must be based on the src IP address, not the dst IP
address.
Imagine an OpenVPN client with 3 interfaces:
19 matches
Mail list logo
