Fwd: which 10g nic

2017-02-08 Thread amir alipour
hello i want to know which 10g nic is best to work with netmap in linux and i also wanted to know which kernel and what distribution to use(if it matters) Thank you for any help you can provide ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebs

[Bug 216922] bpf(4): opening already opened device returns EBUSY; not documented as supported error in open(2) and not documented in bpf manpages

2017-02-08 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216922 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|freebsd-b...@freebsd.org|freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org -- You are

[Differential] D9451: Constrain IPv6 interface routes to each FIB

2017-02-08 Thread jhujhiti_adjectivism.org (Erick Turnquist)
jhujhiti_adjectivism.org marked 6 inline comments as done. jhujhiti_adjectivism.org added a comment. As I mentioned in the PR, this is my first attempt at kernel work, so I very much appreciate the comments. I'll go ahead and update the review summary at my next opportunity. The testcase

Re: Multiple MAC addresses on a single interface

2017-02-08 Thread Alex Dupre
Alex Dupre wrote: > Yes, it seems a bit overkill. I've tried a few other configurations like > changing the mac address of the vlan interface and enabling promiscuous > mode on the ether interface, without success. I solved the issue, I had to enable promiscuous mode on both the ethernet and vlan

Re: Multiple MAC addresses on a single interface

2017-02-08 Thread Freddie Cash
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 10:06 AM, Alex Dupre wrote: > Hi, > I need to establish two PPPoE sessions on the same LAN using the same > ethernet interface. The sessions are on different VLANs, but they are > handled by the same AC that doesn't allow that both sessions are initiated > by the same MAC a

Re: Multiple MAC addresses on a single interface

2017-02-08 Thread Alex Dupre
Alan Somers wrote: > It sounds like overkill, but if you put each PPPoE client in a > separate VIMAGE jail, then each one will get a separate vnet > interface, with distinct MACs. They can be bridged to the same > physical interface. Yes, it seems a bit overkill. I've tried a few other configurat

Re: panic with dhcp assigned jumbo frames/bce interface

2017-02-08 Thread Mark Johnston
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 08:46:35PM -0600, Larry Rosenman wrote: > On 02/07/2017 9:18 am, Larry Rosenman wrote: > > I attempted to set my network up with jumbo frames, and have the MTU > > set via > > DHCP option 26 (9000), and I get my bce0 device bouncing up & down > > like a yo-yo, and > > a pan

Re: Multiple MAC addresses on a single interface

2017-02-08 Thread Alan Somers
It sounds like overkill, but if you put each PPPoE client in a separate VIMAGE jail, then each one will get a separate vnet interface, with distinct MACs. They can be bridged to the same physical interface. -Alan On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Alex Dupre wrote: > Hi, > I need to establish two

[Differential] D9451: Constrain IPv6 interface routes to each FIB

2017-02-08 Thread asomers (Alan Somers)
asomers requested changes to this revision. asomers added a subscriber: bz. asomers added a comment. This revision now requires changes to proceed. In addition to the issues I mentioned inline, could you please also update the review summary to include the full commit message? Try to mention

[Differential] D9451: Constrain IPv6 interface routes to each FIB

2017-02-08 Thread asomers (Alan Somers)
asomers added a reviewer: bz. REPOSITORY rS FreeBSD src repository REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D9451 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: jhujhiti_adjectivism.org, #network, asomers, bz Cc: bz, imp, ae, freebsd-net-list ___

Re: NFSROOT and lagg(4)

2017-02-08 Thread Jan Bramkamp
On 04/02/2017 22:00, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Sat, Feb 04, 2017 at 01:44:21PM -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: "what I want" is to pxe/netboot and then switch over to using a lagg(4) interface that includes the interface used in the pxe/netboot boot up. I suspect, I have to switch to MDROOT to do t

ixgbe interrupt rate on 11-STABLE

2017-02-08 Thread Babak Farrokhi
Hi all, I encountered a new behavior with ixgbe interrupt rates on 11-STABLE which was not present in 10-STABLE. We disable aim and manually set the interrupt rate. On 10-STABLE the interrupt rate will not exceed the configured value, but it is not the case in 11-STABLE. I am wondering if this