hello
i want to know which 10g nic is best to work with netmap in linux
and i also wanted to know which kernel and what distribution to use(if it
matters)
Thank you for any help you can provide
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebs
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216922
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|freebsd-b...@freebsd.org|freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
--
You are
jhujhiti_adjectivism.org marked 6 inline comments as done.
jhujhiti_adjectivism.org added a comment.
As I mentioned in the PR, this is my first attempt at kernel work, so I very
much appreciate the comments. I'll go ahead and update the review summary at my
next opportunity.
The testcase
Alex Dupre wrote:
> Yes, it seems a bit overkill. I've tried a few other configurations like
> changing the mac address of the vlan interface and enabling promiscuous
> mode on the ether interface, without success.
I solved the issue, I had to enable promiscuous mode on both the
ethernet and vlan
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 10:06 AM, Alex Dupre wrote:
> Hi,
> I need to establish two PPPoE sessions on the same LAN using the same
> ethernet interface. The sessions are on different VLANs, but they are
> handled by the same AC that doesn't allow that both sessions are initiated
> by the same MAC a
Alan Somers wrote:
> It sounds like overkill, but if you put each PPPoE client in a
> separate VIMAGE jail, then each one will get a separate vnet
> interface, with distinct MACs. They can be bridged to the same
> physical interface.
Yes, it seems a bit overkill. I've tried a few other configurat
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 08:46:35PM -0600, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> On 02/07/2017 9:18 am, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> > I attempted to set my network up with jumbo frames, and have the MTU
> > set via
> > DHCP option 26 (9000), and I get my bce0 device bouncing up & down
> > like a yo-yo, and
> > a pan
It sounds like overkill, but if you put each PPPoE client in a
separate VIMAGE jail, then each one will get a separate vnet
interface, with distinct MACs. They can be bridged to the same
physical interface.
-Alan
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Alex Dupre wrote:
> Hi,
> I need to establish two
asomers requested changes to this revision.
asomers added a subscriber: bz.
asomers added a comment.
This revision now requires changes to proceed.
In addition to the issues I mentioned inline, could you please also update
the review summary to include the full commit message? Try to mention
asomers added a reviewer: bz.
REPOSITORY
rS FreeBSD src repository
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D9451
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: jhujhiti_adjectivism.org, #network, asomers, bz
Cc: bz, imp, ae, freebsd-net-list
___
On 04/02/2017 22:00, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Sat, Feb 04, 2017 at 01:44:21PM -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
"what I want" is to pxe/netboot and then switch over to using a lagg(4)
interface that includes the interface used in the pxe/netboot boot up.
I suspect, I have to switch to MDROOT to do t
Hi all,
I encountered a new behavior with ixgbe interrupt rates on 11-STABLE which
was not present in 10-STABLE.
We disable aim and manually set the interrupt rate. On 10-STABLE the interrupt
rate will not exceed the configured value, but it is not the case in 11-STABLE.
I am wondering if this
12 matches
Mail list logo