https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204340
Rick Macklem changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Closed |In Progress
Resolution|FIXE
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204340
--- Comment #23 from Rick Macklem ---
Created attachment 179512
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=179512&action=edit
add svcpool_close so that svcpool_destroy doesn't get called when nfsd threads
are killed
This pat
On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 1:00 AM, Jordan Caraballo <
jordancaraball...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Oliver, my bad, I missed that one. Here is the info:
>
> * Switch with 48x 10G ports and 12x 40G ports was used
> * (48) 10G connected nodes were used.
> * (24) nodes on each side of the firewall
> *
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216681
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|freebsd-b...@freebsd.org|freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
K
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202680
--- Comment #28 from Dmitry Afanasiev ---
Bug still exists on stable/10 r309900 - 3 times got ssh disconnections, and got
2 errors for dumb TCP data transfer per ~3Tb of transmitted data.
To check on current I should switch some services f
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216304
Kristof Provost changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org |k...@freebsd.org
Fl
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216304
--- Comment #9 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: kp
Date: Wed Feb 1 21:44:50 UTC 2017
New revision: 313066
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/313066
Log:
MFC 312782
bridge: Release the
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216304
--- Comment #8 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: kp
Date: Wed Feb 1 20:27:38 UTC 2017
New revision: 313050
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/313050
Log:
MFC 312782
bridge: Release the
Hi,
I was researching your company website and I understand that your company is
a "Infor Partner" and I figured it'd be worth leaving a note, We maintain
about 25 Million+ B2B contacts from various industries. We are specialized
in working with companies whose target market is Infor Users. By
Hei,
Ørjan Tønder skrev:
>
> I am trying too get ipv6 up and running but i cant get outside.
> -- /etc/rc.conf
> ipv6_default_interface="re0"
> #ifconfig_re0_ipv6="inet6 accept_rtadv"
> ifconfig_re0_ipv6="inet6 2a01:4f8:131:50a1::2/64"
> ipv6_defaultrouter="inet6 fe80::1%re0"
On 02/01/2017 06:28, Peter Blok wrote:
I just updated to 11-stable@313042 and when I rebootted my system dovecot
didn’t want to start because port 993 was already in use.
Checked with lsof and it was mountd that was listening on this port. When I
stopped mountd and started dovecot everything was
I just updated to 11-stable@313042 and when I rebootted my system dovecot
didn’t want to start because port 993 was already in use.
Checked with lsof and it was mountd that was listening on this port. When I
stopped mountd and started dovecot everything was fine. When I started mountd
after thi
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 08:00:03PM -0400, Jordan Caraballo wrote:
> Hi Oliver, my bad, I missed that one. Here is the info:
>
> * Switch with 48x 10G ports and 12x 40G ports was used
> * (48) 10G connected nodes were used.
> * (24) nodes on each side of the firewall
> * Packet per second (PPS) te
I am trying too get ipv6 up and running but i cant get outside.
-- /etc/rc.conf
ipv6_default_interface="re0"
#ifconfig_re0_ipv6="inet6 accept_rtadv"
ifconfig_re0_ipv6="inet6 2a01:4f8:131:50a1::2/64"
ipv6_defaultrouter="inet6 fe80::1%re0"
-- Routing tables
Internet6:
Destination
14 matches
Mail list logo
