On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 10:53 AM, Sergey Matveychuk
wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Is there a strong reason for option TCP_FASTOPEN is absent in GENERIC
> kernel? It's off by default anyway (net.inet.tcp.fastopen.enabled=0).
>
> Latest dns/bind* versions want it very much.
>
>
The kernel option name is actuall
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 7:15 AM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 11:00:18PM +0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> > Unless eri gets to it first I will.
> >
> > see https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5017
> >
> > If you have a server, you can put an arbitrary number of clients on
> > the
Hi Oliver, my bad, I missed that one. Here is the info:
* Switch with 48x 10G ports and 12x 40G ports was used
* (48) 10G connected nodes were used.
* (24) nodes on each side of the firewall
* Packet per second (PPS) tests were run using 'iperf'
* Bandwidth tests were run using 'nuttcp'
* Paralle
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 6:53 PM, Jordan Caraballo <
jordancaraball...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This are the most recent stats. No advances so far. The system has
> -Current right now.
>
> Any help or feedback would be appreciated.
>
>
I've tried: But you didn't answer my previous question.
How do you
I would also suggest increasing the holdoff timer for the Chelsio and see
what happens:
sysctl dev.t5nex.0.holdoff_timer_idx_10G=3
sysctl dev.t5nex.0.holdoff_timer_idx_10G=4
sysctl dev.t5nex.0.holdoff_timer_idx_10G=5
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 11:10 AM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31,
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196361
--- Comment #15 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: asomers
Date: Tue Jan 31 20:13:50 UTC 2017
New revision: 313025
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/313025
Log:
Add tests for multi-fib IPv
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196361
--- Comment #14 from jhujh...@adjectivism.org ---
(In reply to Alan Somers from comment #13)
Hi Alan,
Sorry for the radio silence - I can fix the test case and submit for formal
code review in the next couple of days if you'd like.
--
Yo
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196361
--- Comment #13 from Alan Somers ---
I've fully reviewed jhujhiti's testcases. Apart from using the wrong syntax to
delete an IPv6 route in same_ip_multiple_ifaces_inet6, it looks good. I'll
commit it with minor changes.
--
You are rece
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 01:53:15PM -0400, Jordan Caraballo wrote:
> This are the most recent stats. No advances so far. The system has
> -Current right now.
This is like you have only one flow: only CPU 26 and 27 loaded.
Use different benchmark, create multiple IP flow (w/ different
source/dest
This are the most recent stats. No advances so far. The system has
-Current right now.
Any help or feedback would be appreciated.
Hardware Configuration:
Dell PowerEdge R530 with 2 Intel(R) Xeon(R) E52695 CPU's, 18 cores per
cpu. Equipped with a Chelsio T-580-CR dual port in an 8x slot.
BIO
Hi.
Is there a strong reason for option TCP_FASTOPEN is absent in GENERIC
kernel? It's off by default anyway (net.inet.tcp.fastopen.enabled=0).
Latest dns/bind* versions want it very much.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebs
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213673
Bjoern A. Zeeb changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org |b...@freebsd.org
--
You are rece
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204340
--- Comment #22 from Andriy Gapon ---
(In reply to Rick Macklem from comment #20)
Rick, thank you very much for the explanation! I knew that nfsd processes were
special as they 'lend their stacks to kernel' or something like that. But I
13 matches
Mail list logo
