[Differential] D9058: alc: Add Killer E2500 support.

This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes. Closed by commit rS312250: alc: Add Killer E2500 support (authored by sephe). CHANGED PRIOR TO COMMIT https://reviews.freebsd.org/D9058?vs=23647&id=24056#toc REPOSITORY rS FreeBSD src repository CHANGES SINCE LAST UPDA

[Bug 215933] SCM_RIGHTS messages being lost, socket data being lost as well (with example code)

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215933 Sepherosa Ziehau changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sepher...@gmail.com --- Comment

Re: 10Gb on budged with fiber — what should IP choose?

You should be able to find T420-CR or T420-BT for half that. The primary difference is that cxgbe is still a supported driver, and it's been high quality from the start unlike a lot of other vendors. You are engaging in archeology with the other cards you mentioned, and may spend way more value i

Problem reports for freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org that need special attention

To view an individual PR, use: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users, which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and ob

iwn logging "need promiscuous mode update callback"

Some time around two months ago I started seeing the message "iwn0: need promiscuous mode update callback" logged every time promiscuous mode was either enabled or disabled. Things still seem to work OK. System is normally built from source and updated about once a month. FreeBSD rogue 11.0-STABLE

[Bug 213869] when setting an ipsec policy with spdadd src[port], outbound traffic from 2049/tcp is not encrypted

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213869 Andrey V. Elsukov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|New |Closed Resolution|---

[Bug 213869] when setting an ipsec policy with spdadd src[port], outbound traffic from 2049/tcp is not encrypted

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213869 --- Comment #11 from commit-h...@freebsd.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: ae Date: Sun Jan 15 15:43:19 UTC 2017 New revision: 312233 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/312233 Log: MFC r311679: Add direction a

Re: 10Gb on budged with fiber — what should IP choose?

So it looks like the answer is yes! Great cards. They will work well for you. -brian > On Jan 15, 2017, at 08:47, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > > Hello Wonko, > > Sunday, January 15, 2017, 3:33:35 PM, you wrote: > > It is what I want to know! :) > >> How good is FreeBSD's mellanox support? You c

Re: 10Gb on budged with fiber — what should IP choose?

Ok I'm going to guess not then as it didn't last time i looked. Ended up going to OmniOS for the storage array as COMSTAR has IB SRP target support out of the box. -brian > On Jan 15, 2017, at 08:37, Ben RUBSON wrote: > > iSER is supported as initiator, however iSER target is missing, you the

Re: 10Gb on budged with fiber — what should IP choose?

Hello Kevin, Sunday, January 15, 2017, 1:03:16 PM, you wrote: > Intel is overpriced and still riding their Ethernet reputation from well > over a decade ago with little to show for it. I would recommend cxgbe > anything, so Chelsio T420 and up. The T520-SO-CR is within reason for > demanding ho

Re: 10Gb on budged with fiber — what should IP choose?

Hello Wonko, Sunday, January 15, 2017, 3:33:35 PM, you wrote: It is what I want to know! :) > How good is FreeBSD's mellanox support? You can get a ConnectX-2 EN for > $15 on eBay and they are amazing cards. -- Best regards, Levmailto:l...@freebsd.org

Re: 10Gb on budged with fiber — what should IP choose?

iSER is supported as initiator, however iSER target is missing, you then have to run a non-FreeBSD iSER target :-/ I'm not sure for SRP. Ben > On 15 Jan 2017, at 14:31, wo...@4amlunch.net wrote: > > SRP target support yet? Last time I looked there wasn't any. :( > > -brian > > On Jan 15, 201

Re: 10Gb on budged with fiber — what should IP choose?

SRP target support yet? Last time I looked there wasn't any. :( -brian On Jan 15, 2017, at 08:22, Ben RUBSON wrote: >> On 15 Jan 2017, at 13:33, wo...@4amlunch.net wrote: >> >> How good is FreeBSD's mellanox support? > > From my own experience with ConnectX-3 adapters, very good ! > > Ben >

Re: 10Gb on budged with fiber — what should IP choose?

> On 15 Jan 2017, at 13:33, wo...@4amlunch.net wrote: > > How good is FreeBSD's mellanox support? >From my own experience with ConnectX-3 adapters, very good ! Ben ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/fre

Re: 10Gb on budged with fiber — what should IP choose?

How good is FreeBSD's mellanox support? You can get a ConnectX-2 EN for $15 on eBay and they are amazing cards. -brian > On Jan 15, 2017, at 05:03, Kevin Bowling wrote: > > Intel is overpriced and still riding their Ethernet reputation from well > over a decade ago with little to show for it.

Re: 10Gb on budged with fiber — what should IP choose?

Intel is overpriced and still riding their Ethernet reputation from well over a decade ago with little to show for it. I would recommend cxgbe anything, so Chelsio T420 and up. The T520-SO-CR is within reason for demanding home office/small office users to purchase new and I've deployed over a th

10Gb on budged with fiber — what should IP choose?

Hello Freebsd-net, I want to attach my DIY-NAS (FreeBSD-based) to my desktop (Windows-based) with 10Gb link. I could not afford 10Gb switch for sure. So, it will be point-to-point connection only for my desktop and not other computers in my house. Also, I could not use my current twisted p