sepherosa_gmail.com created this revision.
sepherosa_gmail.com added reviewers: jhb, decui_microsoft.com.
sepherosa_gmail.com added a subscriber: freebsd-net-list.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D9058
AFFECTED FILES
share/man/man4/alc.4
sys/dev/alc/if_alc.c
sys/dev/alc/if_alc
sepherosa_gmail.com abandoned this revision.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D8904
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: sepherosa_gmail.com, delphij, royger, decui_microsoft.com,
honzhan_microsoft.com, howard0su_gmail.com, adrian, bz
glebius added a comment.
I don't think that the patch is in the right direction. The problem comes
from historical behavior that assigning an address is implicit UP. For a modern
networking equipment it is a normal administrative situation that sysadmin
wants to assign an address or an alias
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit rS311475: if: Defer the if_up until the ifnet.if_ioctl is
called. (authored by sephe).
CHANGED PRIOR TO COMMIT
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D8905?vs=23258&id=23645#toc
REPOSITORY
rS FreeBSD src reposito
tl;dr --> igbX devices will become emX devices
We're about to commit an update to sys/dev/e1000 that will implement and
activate IFLIB for em(4), lem(4) & igb(4) and would appreciate all folks
who can test and poke at the drivers to do so this week. This will have
some really great changes for pe
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117733
Hiren Panchasara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|freebsd-b...@freebsd.org|freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
--- Com
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194697
Hiren Panchasara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
CC|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207200
Hiren Panchasara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|freebsd-b...@freebsd.org|freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=155597
Hiren Panchasara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |Overcome By Events
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=145825
Hiren Panchasara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |Overcome By Events
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=130628
Hiren Panchasara changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hi...@freebsd.org
S
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=140597
Hiren Panchasara changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hi...@freebsd.org
Ass
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167325
Hiren Panchasara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|In Pro
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95277
--- Comment #7 from Hiren Panchasara ---
Provided feedback is missing from the PR. Can someone add that?
Is this still valid?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173478
Hiren Panchasara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|an...@freebsd.org |freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
--- Com
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215778
m...@sentex.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|coredump when loading cxgb |coredump when loading
gnn accepted this revision.
This revision has a positive review.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D8905
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: sepherosa_gmail.com, delphij, royger, decui_microsoft.com,
honzhan_microsoft.com, howard0su_g
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211219
--- Comment #11 from Franco Fichtner ---
Hi Daniel,
If this is ix(4) as per your indication, you need:
hw.ix.enable_msix=0
Cheers,
Franco
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211219
--- Comment #10 from Daniel G ---
We're trying to triage a simmilar problem, where after a (panic) reboot the NIC
remains in "no carrier" state, while the switch thinks the link is online. Our
nic's are using lagg with active/passive failov
> On 03 Jan 2017, at 17:21, Julien Cigar wrote:
>
> is it not the same issue as PR 211990 ? can you try by turning off jumbo
> frames ?
Hi Julien,
With bug 211990 (https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211990),
the main issue was that iSCSI disks did not disconnect properly, so that
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215682
Hajimu UMEMOTO changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|New |In Progress
Assignee|fr
sepherosa_gmail.com added a comment.
In https://reviews.freebsd.org/D8904#185970, @karels wrote:
> I think the change is a step in the right direction. Certainly, "ifconfig
xxN down" followed by an implicit UP should not cause any change to the routing
table. Does anyone know why the "
23 matches
Mail list logo