[Bug 214558] Improve descriptions for sysctl net.inet.tcp.keepinit

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214558 Hiren Panchasara changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|freebsd-b...@freebsd.org|freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org --- Com

[Bug 214955] rpc.lockd sends spurious NLM_UNLOCKs

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214955 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|freebsd-b...@freebsd.org|freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org -- You are

[Bug 215101] [ixgbe] Intel X552 SFP+ fails to initialize when no SFP module is plugged in

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215101 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||IntelNetworking, patch

[Bug 215122] Try to change route default to IP out of range lock the system

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215122 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch Assignee|freebsd-b.

Re: Can netmap be more efficient when it just does bridging between NIC and Linux kernal?

Hi, 2016-12-09 10:02 GMT+01:00 Xiaoye Sun : > Hi Vincenzo, > > Thank you for your suggestion. I think attaching only subset of NIC queues > to netmap is a brilliant idea!!! > > I am going through the instructions on the blog you send to me. > https://blog.cloudflare.com/single-rx-queue-kernel-by

Re: Can netmap be more efficient when it just does bridging between NIC and Linux kernal?

Hi Vincenzo, Thank you for your suggestion. I think attaching only subset of NIC queues to netmap is a brilliant idea!!! I am going through the instructions on the blog you send to me. https://blog.cloudflare.com/single-rx-queue-kernel-bypass-with-netmap/ Now, I can use "ethtool -N eth3" (Config