https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213232
--- Comment #3 from Hiren Panchasara ---
(In reply to Andrey V. Elsukov from comment #2)
All optimized out but because it happens (or at least happened) twice, I can
put some instrumentation to catch those values.
I'll update when I have
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213232
Andrey V. Elsukov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||a...@freebsd.org
--- Comment #
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213257
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|freebsd-b...@freebsd.org|freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
K
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213232
--- Comment #1 from Hiren Panchasara ---
Just hit this again on the same box.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
h
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213237
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ndis does not create|ndis does not create
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213237
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|freebsd-i...@freebsd.org|
Assignee|freebsd-b...@fr
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209682
--- Comment #2 from Hans Petter Selasky ---
Reproducable with recent 11-STABLE doing ifconfig up/down in sequence.
--HPS
270 LLE_REMREF(lle);
271 lltable_unlink_entry(lle->lle_tbl, lle);
272
On 06.10.2016 14:01, Rafa Marin Lopez wrote:
> In the file key.c in netipsec there is a function:
>
> key_spdacquire(struct secpolicy *sp)
>
> which is implemented but in the table:
>
>
> static int (*key_typesw[])(struct socket *, struct mbuf *, const
> struct sadb_msghdr *) = { ...
>
> NULL,
Dear all:
I am a newbie in this mailing list and I am not sure whether this is the right
place to ask (let me know otherwise)
In the file key.c in netipsec there is a function:
key_spdacquire(struct secpolicy *sp)
which is implemented but in the table:
static int (*key_typesw[])(struct socke