i don't know what's different between stable/11 and -head. I'd
appreciate some help in figuring /that/ out...
-a
On 12 August 2016 at 15:53, David Wolfskill wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 03:44:43PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> Heh, ok. So undo the #if 0 and let's just see if it crashes or
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 03:44:43PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Heh, ok. So undo the #if 0 and let's just see if it crashes or not.
> ...
Well, as things presently stand, I can't use wlan0 at work except in
head (which I haven't hacked, and I am running now).
If I boot stable/11, I can only exerc
Heh, ok. So undo the #if 0 and let's just see if it crashes or not.
-adrian
On 12 August 2016 at 15:13, David Wolfskill wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 02:37:44PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Just #if 0 that whole chunk out and see if that improves wireless at work?
>>
>
> That
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 02:37:44PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hi
>
> Just #if 0 that whole chunk out and see if that improves wireless at work?
>
That didn't seem to change the behavior in any observable way.
So I tried booting stable/10... which wouldn't even associate.
As I type, I'm p
Hi
Just #if 0 that whole chunk out and see if that improves wireless at work?
-a
On 12 August 2016 at 14:18, David Wolfskill wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 11:40:03AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> EIther stable/11 or head. Both are fine.
>>
>>
>>
>> -a
>>
>>
>> On 12 August 2016 at 11:05, D
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 11:40:03AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> EIther stable/11 or head. Both are fine.
>
>
>
> -a
>
>
> On 12 August 2016 at 11:05, David Wolfskill wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 11:01:25AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> >> David,
> >>
> >> Totally untested; will need manu
EIther stable/11 or head. Both are fine.
-a
On 12 August 2016 at 11:05, David Wolfskill wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 11:01:25AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> David,
>>
>> Totally untested; will need manual application as I bet this patch is
>> mangled.
>>
>> Would you mind testing this?
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 11:01:25AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> David,
>
> Totally untested; will need manual application as I bet this patch is mangled.
>
> Would you mind testing this? I have a feeling we need to add if_addr
> lock calls in a few places.
Sure; I'll test. Which branch?
Please
David,
Totally untested; will need manual application as I bet this patch is mangled.
Would you mind testing this? I have a feeling we need to add if_addr
lock calls in a few places.
Thanks,
-adrian
Index: sys/net80211/ieee80211_ioctl.c
Yes, got it already. For now, my problem has moved to deep
squid/pf/tproxy issues...
On 12.08.2016 18:37, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Yeah, I integrated them from you like 10 years ago. It's in there somewhere. :-)
(IP_BINDANY?)
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/mailing.freebsd.ipfw/L8lzLmG05WE
On 12/08/2016 11:37 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Yeah, I integrated them from you like 10 years ago. It's in there somewhere. :-)
(IP_BINDANY?)
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/mailing.freebsd.ipfw/L8lzLmG05WE
.. poke me to write up some documentation. :)
-adrian
On 12 August 2016 at 08:29
Yeah, I integrated them from you like 10 years ago. It's in there somewhere. :-)
(IP_BINDANY?)
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/mailing.freebsd.ipfw/L8lzLmG05WE
.. poke me to write up some documentation. :)
-adrian
On 12 August 2016 at 08:29, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 12/08/2016 8:00
On 12/08/2016 8:00 PM, Alex Povolotsky wrote:
Hello
Is SO_BINDANY supported in FreeBSD 10.3? If not, do any patches exists?
I'm certain that it is, somehow, but I'll be damned if I can remember
how to do it..
There were patches for it in the 90s and early 2000s but I seem to
remember they were
Hello
Is SO_BINDANY supported in FreeBSD 10.3? If not, do any patches exists?
Alex
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
14 matches
Mail list logo
