On Jun 10, 2016, at 13:06, Mel Pilgrim
mailto:list_free...@bluerosetech.com>> wrote:
Could the WIDE client be used instead? Unlike the ISC client, it will
configure downstream interfaces from PD prefixes without needing an
external script. It also completely avoids the problem of trying to
upda
Hiroki Sato [2016-06-11 06:00 +0900] :
> "rfc6204w3" is only documented in the result of "sysctl -d
> net.inet6.ip6.rfc6204w3".
This is what I was looking for. Thanks a lot.
Niklaas
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff wrote
in <20160610205025.gg2...@box-hlm-03.niklaas.eu>:
st> Hiroki Sato [2016-06-11 05:37 +0900] :
st>
st> > Unfortunately there is no documentation other than manual page
st> > because this is a bit tricky. rc.conf(5) explains as follows:
st> >
st> >
st> >
Hiroki Sato [2016-06-11 05:37 +0900] :
> Unfortunately there is no documentation other than manual page
> because this is a bit tricky. rc.conf(5) explains as follows:
>
>
>ipv6_cpe_wanif
>
> (str) If the variable is set to an interface name, the
> ifconfig(8) options ``i
Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff wrote
in <20160610191828.ge2...@box-hlm-03.niklaas.eu>:
st> Hiroki Sato [2016-06-10 22:50 +0900] :
st>
st> > A router does not accept RAs (more strictly, default route
st> > information in RA) because it is a sender of RAs. However, some
st> > devices such as CP
Hiroki Sato [2016-06-10 22:50 +0900] :
> A router does not accept RAs (more strictly, default route
> information in RA) because it is a sender of RAs. However, some
> devices such as CPE need to behave like a host for the uplink and a
> router for the LAN. In that case, an interface on the
On 2016-06-09 14:14, David Bright wrote:
Following up on a conversation I started today at BSDCan
2016/DevSummit.
I’d like to see support for DHCPv6 in the base system. I have made
modifications to network.subr and the rc.d init scripts to allow
configuring a network interface to use DHCPv6 in a
Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff wrote
in <20160610071254.gc2...@box-hlm-03.niklaas.eu>:
st> Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff [2016-06-10 08:52 +0200] :
st>
st> > 8<
st> > ifconfig_vtnet0="DHCP"
st> > ifconfig_vtnet0_ipv6="inet6 accept_rtadv"
st> > rtsold_enable=
i cant remember exactly but i dont think you need them for jails either
unless they are vnet ones (depending on your topology). I could be wrong on
that though.
On 10 June 2016 at 11:31, Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff
wrote:
> krad [2016-06-10 11:23 +0100] :
>
> > No, you should only need the if y
Thank you, you can find enclosed a patch following your suggestion.
- Le 8 Juin 16, à 22:40, Eric Joyner ricer...@gmail.com a écrit :
> I think a better fix here is to have the driver not call init_locked() when
> the driver is not running when setting the MTU.
>
> It looks like all the othe
krad [2016-06-10 11:23 +0100] :
> No, you should only need the if you want to act as a router for some other
> machines.
>
> gateway_enable="YES"
> ipv6_gateway_enable="YES"
I need these for jails that are connected on lo1 and a VPN tunnel on
tap0. Sorry, in case that was essential information t
also dont forget to check in rc.conf.local as well as rc.conf
On 10 June 2016 at 11:23, krad wrote:
> No, you should only need the if you want to act as a router for some other
> machines.
>
> gateway_enable="YES"
> ipv6_gateway_enable="YES"
>
> The following should only be required for normal
No, you should only need the if you want to act as a router for some other
machines.
gateway_enable="YES"
ipv6_gateway_enable="YES"
The following should only be required for normal ipv6
ifconfig_vtnet0_ipv6="inet6 accept_rtadv"
rtsold_enable="YES"
Have a look at these variables, and make sure t
Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff [2016-06-10 08:52 +0200] :
> 8<
> ifconfig_vtnet0="DHCP"
> ifconfig_vtnet0_ipv6="inet6 accept_rtadv"
> rtsold_enable="YES"
> >8
[...]
> 8<
> ipv6_def
14 matches
Mail list logo
