lstewart added a comment.
In https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5872#128556, @hiren wrote:
> In https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5872#128555, @lstewart wrote:
>
> > I thought that had been fixed ages ago... oops.
>
>
> Fixed? i.e. doing something other than setting cwnd to 1 seg?
Y
sepherosa_gmail.com added a comment.
In https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5872#128556, @hiren wrote:
> In https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5872#128555, @lstewart wrote:
>
> > I thought that had been fixed ages ago... oops.
>
>
> Fixed? i.e. doing something other than setting cwnd to 1 seg
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206581
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|freebsd-b...@freebsd.org|freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
--
You are
hiren added a comment.
In https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5872#128555, @lstewart wrote:
> I thought that had been fixed ages ago... oops.
Fixed? i.e. doing something other than setting cwnd to 1 seg?
> It should be calling cc_cong_signal() with a new congestion type.
Hum...
lstewart added a comment.
I thought that had been fixed ages ago... oops. It should be calling
cc_cong_signal() with a new congestion type. Just leave that line as is for the
moment though as Mike says.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5872
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://reviews.
sepherosa_gmail.com added a comment.
In https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5872#128542, @mike-karels.net wrote:
> btw, I think the line to set the snd_cwnd should remain for now, until
something replaces it. ENOBUFS signals local congestion.
ok.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.fre
mike-karels.net added a comment.
btw, I think the line to set the snd_cwnd should remain for now, until
something replaces it. ENOBUFS signals local congestion.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5872
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreference
hiren added a comment.
In https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5872#128539, @lstewart wrote:
> ... but replace with a macro to check that the rexmit/persist timer is
armed if appropriate!
Yes, that would be useful!
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5872
EMAIL PREFERENCES
lstewart added a comment.
... but replace with a macro to check that the rexmit/persist timer is armed
if appropriate!
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5872
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: sepherosa_gmail.com, network, glebi
hiren added a comment.
Ack for removing ENOBUFs case.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5872
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: sepherosa_gmail.com, network, glebius, adrian, delphij,
decui_microsoft.com, honzhan_microsoft.com,
jtl added a comment.
FWIW, I agree with deleting the ENOBUFs special-case. If we haven't already
set the right timers by here, we have another bug which needs to be fixed.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5872
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/email
sepherosa_gmail.com added a comment.
In https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5872#128535, @gnn wrote:
> Not my comment "once everyone agrees" :-)
heh, just read the first part of the comment :P
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5872
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://reviews.freebs
gnn added a comment.
Not my comment "once everyone agrees" :-)
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5872
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: sepherosa_gmail.com, network, glebius, adrian, delphij,
decui_microsoft.com, honzhan_micros
sepherosa_gmail.com added a comment.
In https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5872#128530, @gnn wrote:
> Let's keep this moving along. Mike isn't (yet) a committer but if someone
can commit this once everyone agrees that would be great.
OK, I will do it.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews
gnn added a comment.
Let's keep this moving along. Mike isn't (yet) a committer but if someone
can commit this once everyone agrees that would be great.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5872
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To:
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit rS298385: dhclient: Log a warning instead of bailing upon
"illegal" options (authored by sephe).
CHANGED PRIOR TO COMMIT
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5853?vs=14915&id=15413#toc
REPOSITORY
rS FreeBSD sr
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208566
Cy Schubert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org |c...@freebsd.org
CC|
On 04/05/2016 01:30, Steven Crangle wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> I'm looking for a bit of help to track down the reason behind this
> kernel panic, it seems like netmap works fine for the majority of the
> time, but occasionally it will cause the box to kernel panic.
>
>
> The machine is running FreeB
On 04/15/2016 22:38, bazzoola wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I would like to know where (in the kernel) UDP packets are dropped.
Have you tried netstat -sp udp ? If the drops show up in some counter
there then you can look at the kernel code to see where the counter is
incremented.
Regards,
Navdeep
>
Raimundo Santos wrote on 04/20/2016 18:54:
In this scenario, it's needed to compile my kernel with HZ=1000?
And, in general, is it still needed to compile a custom kernel for dummynet
to work more precisely?
hz=1000 is the default value. You can check it by sysctl:
# sysctl kern.hz
kern.hz:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208566
--- Comment #2 from andywh...@gmail.com ---
Aleks
can you post output of ipnat -s ? for me I see "bucket max in" increasing when
things are not working right
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
__
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203735
tim...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tim...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2
On 04/20/16 18:54, Raimundo Santos wrote:
> Hello, folks!
>
> I have a FreeBSD 10.2-RELEASE taking care of the bandwidth limitation of a
> small WISP. There are around 1400 dynamic queues and dynamic schedulers,
> and a big queue for a better QoS.
>
> Every scheduler and the big one for QoS have
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208653
--- Comment #7 from Mats ---
Yes Please.
The only improvement I can see is that it would be nice if the driver would set
"media 100baseTX -mediaopt full-duplex" by default if it detects a fibre only
card since a fibre card only can be full
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208653
Sean Bruno changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|New |Closed
Resolution|---
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208653
--- Comment #5 from Mats ---
Brown paper bag in head-size ordered :)
I must have done something wrong yesterday then i tested ifconfig pcn0 media
100baseTX -mediaopt full-duplex because it worked today.
Big thanks to you Sean Bruno for th
Hello, folks!
I have a FreeBSD 10.2-RELEASE taking care of the bandwidth limitation of a
small WISP. There are around 1400 dynamic queues and dynamic schedulers,
and a big queue for a better QoS.
Every scheduler and the big one for QoS have GRED configured.
In this scenario, it's needed to compi
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208653
--- Comment #4 from Sean Bruno ---
(In reply to Mats from comment #3)
Hrm ... fiber eh?
what about using 100baseFX in the media type when you use ifconfig?
List the media types with an "ifconfig -m pcn0"
Maybe that will help us move forw
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208653
--- Comment #3 from Mats ---
(In reply to Sean Bruno from comment #2)
hostb0@pci0:0:0:0: class=0x06 card=0x82761043 chip=0x29c08086 rev=0x02
hdr=0x00
vendor = 'Intel Corporation'
device = '82G33/G31/P35/P31 Express
What you described doesn't work in FreeBSD, and there's even an open bug
for it. But as Julian described, you should see if VIMAGE will work for
you.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189088
-Alan
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 4:19 AM, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 20/04/2016 5:58 PM,
I tried backing out that change and everything worked for a few minutes and
then started acting up again. Then I notice Sean Bruno's "TCP Packets
Drop!!!" email about LACP. I disabled LACP on the switch side and then
changed the lagg config from "lacp" to "roundrobin", and so far so good.
On the
On 20/04/2016 5:58 PM, M. V. via freebsd-net wrote:
Hello guys,
I have a problem with having multiple FIBs in FreeBSD-9.2. I've already setup 4
FIBs in kernel, and everything is OK. I assigned each interface to one FIB and
I can add routes to any of FIBs I want, and everything works fine.But my
Hello guys,
I have a problem with having multiple FIBs in FreeBSD-9.2. I've already setup 4
FIBs in kernel, and everything is OK. I assigned each interface to one FIB and
I can add routes to any of FIBs I want, and everything works fine.But my
problem is, I want to assign same IP address to mult
On 2016-04-20, at 1:15, K. Macy wrote:
> FWIW, NFLX sees performance close to that of cxgbe (by far the best
> maintained, best performing FreeBSD 40G driver) with an iflib
> converted driver. The iflib updated driver will be imported by 11 but
> won't become the default driver until 11.1 for wont
34 matches
Mail list logo
