Re: IPFW with NAT : Problems with duplicate packets on FreeBSD 10.3-RC3

On Thu, 7 Apr 2016 17:08:38 +0100, Dr Josef Karthauser wrote: [ AppleMail msgs fail to quote properly in pine, so a partial quote: ] > Looks like the first packet is being retransmitted, which means that > the nat is probably misconfigured and the TCP connection is broken in > some strange wa

Re: nfe: up-down pingpong at boot time, but no dhcp

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi folks, On 04/06/16 15:12, Harald Dunkel wrote: > Hi folks, > > the nfe driver of FreeBSD 4.3 does some kind of up-down pingpong at boot > time. DHCP is stuck in an endless loop. No login, unless I disconnect the > ethernet cable :-(. See the a

Re: IPFW with NAT : Problems with duplicate packets on FreeBSD 10.3-RC3

> On 8 Apr 2016, at 00:11, Dr Josef Karthauser wrote: > >> On 7 Apr 2016, at 17:08, Dr Josef Karthauser > > wrote: >> >> Looks like the first packet is being retransmitted, which means that the nat >> is probably misconfigured and the TCP connection is broken in some

Re: IPFW with NAT : Problems with duplicate packets on FreeBSD 10.3-RC3

> On 7 Apr 2016, at 17:08, Dr Josef Karthauser wrote: > > Looks like the first packet is being retransmitted, which means that the nat > is probably misconfigured and the TCP connection is broken in some strange > way. > > Does anyone have a clue as to where to look? The ipfw rules are simple

[Bug 208389] Netmap Panic

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208389 --- Comment #17 from Shawn Webb --- Got the same panic with bce1. Here's the pciconf -lv info for it: bce1@pci0:132:0:1: class=0x02 card=0x191714e4 chip=0x163914e4 rev=0x20 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Broadcom Corporation' devi

IPFW with NAT : Problems with duplicate packets on FreeBSD 10.3-RC3

I’m scratching my head with an IPFW / NAT configuration; could someone please throw me a bone? I’ve got a jail, and I’m NATing using IPFW to connect it to the outside world. In particular I’m forwarding port 8080 from the host’s public address to the jail’s private address. When I pull an HTTP

[Bug 207840] Driver ix-3.1.14 not work without 'options INET6'

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207840 Jeff Pieper changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jeffrey.e.pie...@intel.com --- Comme

RE: Vale port naming

>please fetch the version from >github.com/luigirizzo/netmap if >you want a more recent version of the code, and email me >directly if you have a panic. >Both the versioni in HEAD and 10.x are lagging a bit behind. >cheers >luigi I’m probably doing something

Re: IPv6 support in OFED

On 04/06/16 20:55, Vijay Singh wrote: [Apologies for the cross-post] I see that the OFED stack supports IPv6 in many places, so I was wondering why we have this in rdma_listen(): int rdma_listen(struct rdma_cm_id *id, int backlog) { struct rdma_id_private *id_priv; int ret;