https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=148807
--- Comment #22 from g_amana...@yahoo.com ---
Applying the patch at "https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5330"; on 10.2-STABLE with
ipfw+nat results in this bug when I attempt to lower the mtu on the
WAN-interface from 1500 with "route change defau
On Sun, 21 Feb 2016, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 20/02/2016 6:22 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
Dear Experts,
I'm one of Linux refugees who several years ago migrated majority of
servers from Linux to FreeBSD and is happy since. When recently I needed
to set up gateway (Firewall + NAT) machine, I set
On 2/20/2016 9:22 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
Dear Experts,
I'm one of Linux refugees who several years ago migrated majority of
servers from Linux to FreeBSD and is happy since. When recently I needed
to set up gateway (Firewall + NAT) machine, I set up FreeBSD 10.2 on it,
used ipwf and natd, and
On 20/02/2016 6:22 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
Dear Experts,
I'm one of Linux refugees who several years ago migrated majority of
servers from Linux to FreeBSD and is happy since. When recently I needed
to set up gateway (Firewall + NAT) machine, I set up FreeBSD 10.2 on it,
used ipwf and natd, an
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=148807
--- Comment #21 from g_amana...@yahoo.com ---
This one persists on 10.2-STABLE.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=153937
Andriy Voskoboinyk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|In P
On 2016-02-20 20:22:01 (-0600), Valeri Galtsev
wrote:
> Dear Experts,
>
> I'm one of Linux refugees who several years ago migrated majority of
> servers from Linux to FreeBSD and is happy since. When recently I needed
> to set up gateway (Firewall + NAT) machine, I set up FreeBSD 10.2 on it,
> u
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 08:23:28PM +0100, Tino Engel wrote:
> Thanks very much for the quick reply.
>
> So let me shed some words on your input:
>
> First: Limiting the memory size did not help at all, nothing changed.
> Unfortunetly I cannot post the whole results of the sysctl, since I cannot
