[Bug 207087] kernel: r295285 in 10.2-STABLE breaks OpenVPN functionality

2016-02-10 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207087 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||regression -- You are receiving th

[Bug 207087] kernel: r295285 in 10.2-STABLE breaks OpenVPN functionality

2016-02-10 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207087 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|freebsd-b...@freebsd.org|g...@freebsd.org --- Comment #7 fro

[Bug 207087] kernel: r295285 in 10.2-STABLE breaks OpenVPN functionality

2016-02-10 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207087 --- Comment #6 from mgro...@shrew.net --- Doah, sorry. I stopped and started writing that last paragraph while in the middle of something else. I was still thinking of things in terms of tunneling. Please disregard and I'll go away and be qu

[Bug 207087] kernel: r295285 in 10.2-STABLE breaks OpenVPN functionality

2016-02-10 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207087 --- Comment #5 from mgro...@shrew.net --- I see. They underlying cause is quite possibly unrelated then. As I said, I wasn't trying to hijack your bug report. But the symptom still sounds similar in the respect that some of your UDP traffic

[Bug 207087] kernel: r295285 in 10.2-STABLE breaks OpenVPN functionality

2016-02-10 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207087 --- Comment #4 from g_amana...@yahoo.com --- (In reply to mgrooms from comment #3) This issue concerns only 10.2-STABLE (now 10.3-BETA1) which is about to become 10.3-RELEASE. The commit has not been applied to 10.2-RELEASE, so you must be f

[Bug 207087] kernel: r295285 in 10.2-STABLE breaks OpenVPN functionality

2016-02-10 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207087 mgro...@shrew.net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mgro...@shrew.net --- Comment #

[Bug 207087] kernel: r295285 in 10.2-STABLE breaks OpenVPN functionality

2016-02-10 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207087 --- Comment #2 from g_amana...@yahoo.com --- Also I just figured out that my Android devices which connect directly to the gateway running the OpenVPN server (they connect to the internal interface and not through OpenVPN) are not able to op

[Bug 207087] kernel: r295285 in 10.2-STABLE breaks OpenVPN functionality

2016-02-10 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207087 g_amana...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||a...@freebsd.org,

Re: ifconfig with quoted arguments

2016-02-10 Thread Kevin Oberman
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 12:23 AM, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > On 10.02.2016 04:51, Jeremy Boy wrote: > > Hello list, > > > > please CC me in replies to this mail, since I am no subscriber to this > list. > > > > For safety reasons, we enclose user input to shell commands in quotes. > Until today, th

Re: C program API to determine negotiated link speed of a network interface?

2016-02-10 Thread Ravi Pokala
>Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 22:51:27 + (UTC) >From: Pallav Bose >To: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" >Subject: C program API to determine negotiated link speed of a network > interface? >Message-ID: > <249322925.1631277.1455058288002.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> >Content-Type: text/plain;

Re: swaping ring slots between NIC ring and Host ring does not always success

2016-02-10 Thread Xiaoye Sun
Hi Luigi, Thanks Luigi! Pinning the process to one CPU core solves the reorder problem!!! Let me check if the duplicated packet problem is solved also. Thanks! Best, Xiaoye On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 7:21 AM, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 1:12 PM, Xiaoye Sun wrote: > > Hi Luigi, >

Slow performance in high latency situation on FreeNAS / FreeBSD 9

2016-02-10 Thread Adam Baxter
Hi all, I've got a new FreeNAS 9.3 box which is getting very, very slow transfers once the latency of the remote host goes over 200ms. The system is based on a SuperMicro A1SRi-2758F board - see http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/Atom/X10/A1SRi-2758F.cfm. FreeNAS boots fine on it once

Re: swaping ring slots between NIC ring and Host ring does not always success

2016-02-10 Thread Luigi Rizzo
On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 1:12 PM, Xiaoye Sun wrote: > Hi Luigi, > > Have you seen the previous email. any comments? Hi, to summarize, you are seeing reordering when reinjecting packets into the host stack from bridge.c On Linux, the NIOCTXSYNC towards the host stack calls netif_rx() one packet at

[Bug 207056] Changing the MAC address on the lagg interface doesn't get retained after lagg port delete operation.

2016-02-10 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207056 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|freebsd-b...@freebsd.org|freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org -- You are

[Bug 207055] ipv6 pmtu discovery not working with pf active

2016-02-10 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207055 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|freebsd-b...@freebsd.org|freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org -- You are

tcp6/long connects

2016-02-10 Thread Larry Rosenman
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206904 related to the above captioned bug, I seem to have an issue with tcp6 connects. They take a LONG time (time out, or many seconds) from a FreeBSD -CURRENT (@r295321). a windows 10 box on the same network/subnet/LAN has ZERO issues con

[Bug 206904] tailq crash/nd inet6

2016-02-10 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206904 --- Comment #6 from Larry Rosenman --- this seems to be at the root of my tcp6 issues. I've put a bunch more core.txt's at: http://www.lerctr.org/~ler/FreeBSD/ I've also put dmesg, loader.conf, rc.conf, sysctl.conf there. I'd really li

Re: Google Summer of Code 2016, unified ping/ping6, traceroute/traceroute6, ...

2016-02-10 Thread Rohit Dua
Hi I'm willing to work on this project for GSOC 2016. I'm looking forward to a more elaborate description on these topics. I'm not sure but can't we just use the freebsd-net mailing list for these GSOC project(s) Thanks Rohit Dua On 9 Feb 2016 23:24, "Mark Martinec" wrote: > There is now a time

Re: ifconfig with quoted arguments

2016-02-10 Thread Eugene Grosbein
On 10.02.2016 04:51, Jeremy Boy wrote: > Hello list, > > please CC me in replies to this mail, since I am no subscriber to this list. > > For safety reasons, we enclose user input to shell commands in quotes. Until > today, the resulting command for ifconfig(8) looked like this: > >> ifconfig u