Hi,
On 11 January 2016 at 18:18, Hongjiang Zhang wrote:
> Hi Hiren,
>
> Thanks for your information. I found some information from internet
> (https://lwn.net/Articles/358910/), which talks the difference of LRO and GRO
> on Linux, and it also points out some shortcomings of LRO: breaks things
Hi Hiren,
Thanks for your information. I found some information from internet
(https://lwn.net/Articles/358910/), which talks the difference of LRO and GRO
on Linux, and it also points out some shortcomings of LRO: breaks things if
system works as a router.
So, how about LRO in FreeBSD?
Could
On 01/11/16 at 11:19P, Hongjiang Zhang wrote:
> Is there any plan to support GRO (Generic Receive Offloading)?
Not that I am aware of. Though there are efforts/talks/patches to
improve LRO.
Cheers,
Hiren
pgpI599kBBDQ0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206122
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Assignee|freebsd-b.
Hi all,
LRO has been enabled since FreeBSD 7.1. Is there any plan to support GRO
(Generic Receive Offloading)?
I also found Linux disabled LRO and enabled GRO by default. It looks like GRO
is better than LRO.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
h
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185427
--- Comment #9 from eu...@grosbein.net ---
(In reply to napTu from comment #8)
There seem to be some problems with multithreading and/or locks within 9.x
kernel/ng_nat code. 82576 just adds extra parallelism as it supports MSI-X and
multipl
