Hi,
It appears the IPv6 router advertisement code paths were written fairly
lockless, assuming you would never process multiples concurrently. We
are seeing multiple page faults in various places processing the
messages and modifying the routing table. We have multiple L3 devices
and multip
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203630
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|New |In Progress
--- Comment #20 from K
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203630
--- Comment #19 from Wei Hu ---
(In reply to Eddy from comment #18)
Not yet. I will try to do it this week.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
freeb
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200221
Andre changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||a.hei...@gmail.com
--- Comment #23 from An
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205083
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|bce bridge |bce: impossible to
Hi,
On 30/05/14 06:12, k simon wrote:
> Does any plan commit and MFC to the 10-stable ?
I got a bit of interest of having the performance improvements for
short-lived TCP connections in 10-stable. Just to share the current
status to a wider audience:
- I maintain a stack of our TCP perfor
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203630
--- Comment #18 from Eddy ---
Hi Wei,
Is the patch merged to stable branch?
Thank you.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org m
