Re: ixl 40G bad performance?

2015-10-25 Thread Kevin Oberman
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 12:10 AM, Daniel Engberg < daniel.engberg.li...@pyret.net> wrote: > One thing I've noticed that probably affects your performance benchmarks > somewhat is that you're using iperf(2) instead of the newer iperf3 but I > could be wrong... > > Best regards, > Daniel > iperf3 i

[Bug 196361] IPv6 routes leak between FIBs

2015-10-25 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196361 --- Comment #1 from jhujh...@adjectivism.org --- >From my perspective as an amateur kernel hacker, this appears to be intentional behavior. We have comments in the "FIB-aware" code like this: "/* Announce arrival of local address to all FIBs

Problem reports for freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org that need special attention

2015-10-25 Thread bugzilla-noreply
To view an individual PR, use: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users, which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and ob

Re: Jail - PF - NAT - Network Performance

2015-10-25 Thread James Lodge
> On 25 Oct 2015, at 18:47, James Lodge wrote: > >> On 25 Oct 2015, at 17:46, James Lodge wrote: >> I currently have a FreeBSD 10.1 host running on Digital Ocean. I have >> multiple jails and I'm not using vimage. >> >> >> I'm using PF on the host to NAT traffic from said jails and all is workin

Re: Jail - PF - NAT - Network Performance

2015-10-25 Thread Kristof Provost
> On 25 Oct 2015, at 18:47, James Lodge wrote: > >> On 25 Oct 2015, at 17:46, James Lodge wrote: >> I currently have a FreeBSD 10.1 host running on Digital Ocean. I have >> multiple jails and I'm not using vimage. >> >> >> I'm using PF on the host to NAT traffic from said jails and all is wo

Re: Jail - PF - NAT - Network Performance

2015-10-25 Thread James Lodge
> On 25 Oct 2015, at 17:46, James Lodge wrote: > I currently have a FreeBSD 10.1 host running on Digital Ocean. I have > multiple jails and I'm not using vimage. > > > I'm using PF on the host to NAT traffic from said jails and all is working as > expected. I have a jail running OpenVPN and clie

Re: Jail - PF - NAT - Network Performance

2015-10-25 Thread Kristof Provost
> On 25 Oct 2015, at 17:46, James Lodge wrote: > I currently have a FreeBSD 10.1 host running on Digital Ocean. I have > multiple jails and I'm not using vimage. > > > I'm using PF on the host to NAT traffic from said jails and all is working as > expected. I have a jail running OpenVPN and c

Jail - PF - NAT - Network Performance

2015-10-25 Thread James Lodge
Dear All, I wonder if you'd be so kind as to help/point me in the right direction in order to fix a network performance issue I seem to have. I currently have a FreeBSD 10.1 host running on Digital Ocean. I have multiple jails and I'm not using vimage. I'm using PF on the host to NAT traffi

[Bug 203175] Daily kernel crashes in tcp_twclose on 10.2-p2 using VIMAGE

2015-10-25 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203175 Kubilay Kocak changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||crash, needs-qa, patch

ixl 40G bad performance?

2015-10-25 Thread Daniel Engberg
One thing I've noticed that probably affects your performance benchmarks somewhat is that you're using iperf(2) instead of the newer iperf3 but I could be wrong... Best regards, Daniel ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org