[Bug 202983] ixv driver in 11.0-CURRENT(10.1 & 10.2 RELEASE) doesn't pass traffic using XEN hypervisor(AWS EC2)

2015-09-08 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202983 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|freebsd-b...@freebsd.org|freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org -- You are

[Bug 202875] ixv driver in 11.0-CURRENT doesn't pass traffic using KVM hypervisor

2015-09-08 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202875 Jarrod Petz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jlp...@gmail.com --- Comment #7 from

Re: Problem with receiving packets right after remote-interface is up

2015-09-08 Thread M. V. via freebsd-net
Hi guys, On Sun, 9/6/15, Artem Belevich wrote: > While you can indeed set speed/duplex manually, you will also need > to make sure both have have proper clock master/slave >  selection  which is normally done via autonegotiation. On > Freebsd some interfaces support "mediaopt master" > option ..

[Bug 202960] Kernel panic when bridging e1000 NIC with pf rules

2015-09-08 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202960 --- Comment #2 from jeff...@endrift.com --- I was able to work around this by adding a pf rule that drops incoming IPv6 multicast traffic to em0. Suboptimal, but no more kernel panics. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the as

[Bug 202960] Kernel panic when bridging e1000 NIC with pf rules

2015-09-08 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202960 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|freebsd-b...@freebsd.org|freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org K

PF_LOCAL support in getaddrinfo/getnameinfo

2015-09-08 Thread Hiroki Sato
Hi, Is there any problem with adding PF_LOCAL support into getaddrinfo() and getnameinfo()? It was not standardized but can be implemented in a straight forward way (attached). Some old posts in mailing list archives (not for FreeBSD) said it was removed in glibc due to a security issue tha

Re: more net80211 changes :/

2015-09-08 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 07:31:41PM +0300, Andriy Voskoboinyk wrote: A> > The current patch covers iwn(4) only. Now sending this mail with patched A> > driver. Changing MAC aldo tested - works. A> > A> > I'm starting to convert rest of drivers and meanwhile, waiting for your A> > input. May be you h

Re: more net80211 changes :/

2015-09-08 Thread Andriy Voskoboinyk
The current patch covers iwn(4) only. Now sending this mail with patched driver. Changing MAC aldo tested - works. I'm starting to convert rest of drivers and meanwhile, waiting for your input. May be you have ideas what else can be improved here. Do not forget to free iv_softc - it's allocate

Re: more net80211 changes :/

2015-09-08 Thread Andriy Voskoboinyk
The current patch covers iwn(4) only. Now sending this mail with patched driver. Changing MAC aldo tested - works. I'm starting to convert rest of drivers and meanwhile, waiting for your input. May be you have ideas what else can be improved here. Do not forget to free iv_softc - it's allocate

Re: more net80211 changes :/

2015-09-08 Thread Adrian Chadd
I'm fine with this. The main odd-ball here is iwm(4) that requires interrupts to be up before the NIC is initialised (firmware), and it will do firmware loading and commands before you can get the MAC which is required for attach. Flesh it out a bit more with iwm(4) and I'll take a look at the res

more net80211 changes :/

2015-09-08 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
Hi! It looks like another sweep over net80211 drivers is required. It isn't going to be as huge as previous one. The problem is that in the "new world order", there will be only if_attach(), instead of if_alloc() / fill & hack / ether_ifattach. What right now happens with net80211 is that all

[Bug 202907] 10.2 on SolarFlare SFN5162F 10Gb/s NIC missing out traffic

2015-09-08 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202907 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Rybchenko --- That's my fault. Since statistics support differs in HEAD (if_get_counter) and earlier stable branches (periodic update of counters in ifnet). I've forgotten to merge stable/10-specific patch. I'll c

Questions about the FreeBSD network subsystem

2015-09-08 Thread Roger Pau Monné
Hello, I'm not very familiar with FreeBSD network subsystem and I'm trying to import a new version of xen-netfront from Linux to FreeBSD. So far so good, most stuff is pretty similar and I think I've _mostly_ figured it out by myself. I have however a couple of questions regarding the network subs