Re: Problem with receiving packets right after remote-interface is up

2015-09-05 Thread Artem Belevich
On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > You may be able to avoid the issue if you avoid autonegotiation and > manually set the media type, speed and duplex. > Technically, 1G ethernet *requires* autonegotiation. http://standards.ieee.org/findstds/interps/IEEE802.3af-2003interp-6.pdf

Re: Problem with receiving packets right after remote-interface is up

2015-09-05 Thread Luigi Rizzo
You may be able to avoid the issue if you avoid autonegotiation and manually set the media type, speed and duplex. Cheers Luigi On Saturday, September 5, 2015, M. V. via freebsd-net < freebsd-net@freebsd.org> wrote: > Hi, > > Our product is being tested with Spirent TestCenter, and we're facing

Problem with receiving packets right after remote-interface is up

2015-09-05 Thread M. V. via freebsd-net
Hi, Our product is being tested with Spirent TestCenter, and we're facing an unusual problem with the tests. We use NICs with intel 82574 and 82576 on FreeBSD 9.2 with latest em and igb drivers (we also tested this on FreeBSD-10.1) It seems what Spirent TestCenter does to start any individual t

[Bug 202875] ixv driver in 11.0-CURRENT doesn't pass traffic using KVM hypervisor

2015-09-05 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202875 --- Comment #3 from Patrick Kelsey --- (In reply to Jeff Pieper from comment #0) Some additional thoughts: 1. In the reported configuration, the Linux ixgbe driver in the host is running the PF, and the FreeBSD ixgbe driver(s)s in the gue

[Bug 202875] ixv driver in 11.0-CURRENT doesn't pass traffic using KVM hypervisor

2015-09-05 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202875 --- Comment #2 from Patrick Kelsey --- (In reply to Jeff Pieper from comment #0) What are the results when you only attach an 11.0-CURRENT guest in step 3 of your reproduction steps? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the as

em, igb performance test

2015-09-05 Thread Nomad Esst via freebsd-net
Hi allDuring some performance tests, we found out some weird problems. We use a shell script that do the following : do from 1 to 10Shutdown em/igb interfacesleep 3Bring em/igb interface uptcpreplay -i em0 -l ospf_hello.pcap sleep3end By running this shell on one side we expect 10 ospf hello pack