Adrian,
On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 12:33:53PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
A> We have to do mbuf queues in drivers for wifi, because of 11n
A> aggregation. So on one hand we want to have if_transmit() apply
A> backpressure through the stack, but there's also going to be some
A> buffering. :P
No, tha
On 09/01/15 at 09:19P, Patrick Kelsey wrote:
> Hi,
>
> About two weeks from now, I will be starting work on server-side TCP Fast
> Open (TFO) support for FreeBSD head and stable/10, with the intention of
> having patches up for review by November.
Awesome!
Looking forward to it.
Cheers,
Hiren
> On Sep 2, 2015, at 12:54 AM, Rui Paulo wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 2015-09-01 at 21:19 -0400, Patrick Kelsey wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> About two weeks from now, I will be starting work on server-side TCP
>> Fast
>> Open (TFO) support for FreeBSD head and stable/10, with the intention
>> of
>> having p
On Tue, 2015-09-01 at 21:19 -0400, Patrick Kelsey wrote:
> Hi,
>
> About two weeks from now, I will be starting work on server-side TCP
> Fast
> Open (TFO) support for FreeBSD head and stable/10, with the intention
> of
> having patches up for review by November. This message is an attempt
> t
Bufferbloat on my DSL link to the outside world has been bugging me
lately. I was considering adding an OpenWrt box between my DSL modem
and my FreeBSD firewall in order to get CoDel, when I discovered that
CoDel had been quietly added to FreeBSD 11. Unfortunately the
documentation is severely la
Hi,
About two weeks from now, I will be starting work on server-side TCP Fast
Open (TFO) support for FreeBSD head and stable/10, with the intention of
having patches up for review by November. This message is an attempt to
uncover any existing work on TFO for FreeBSD, as the existence of such wor
On Tue, 2015-09-01 at 12:33 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> hi,
>
> We have to do mbuf queues in drivers for wifi, because of 11n
> aggregation. So on one hand we want to have if_transmit() apply
> backpressure through the stack, but there's also going to be some
> buffering. :P
net80211 also has an
hi,
We have to do mbuf queues in drivers for wifi, because of 11n
aggregation. So on one hand we want to have if_transmit() apply
backpressure through the stack, but there's also going to be some
buffering. :P
I'd like to see that for ic_transmit().
Other thing - ic_transmit() also needs to hand
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202351
Kristof Provost changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|New |Closed
Assignee|freebs
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202351
--- Comment #4 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: kp
Date: Tue Sep 1 19:04:05 UTC 2015
New revision: 287376
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/287376
Log:
pf: Fix misdetection of forwardin
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202680
--- Comment #7 from Dmitry Afanasiev ---
(In reply to Sean Bruno from comment #4)
"pciconf -lvbc" output and dmesg.boot from "boot -v" attached.
I'm not sure that the problem is similar to PR196980, because I have no
"Allocation of PCI res
01.09.2015, 09:50, "Nigel Williams" :
> Hi,
>
> A new mptcp v0.5 patch is available at
> http://caia.swin.edu.au/urp/newtcp/mptcp/tools.html. This release
> represents a near-complete rewrite of the v0.4 implementation and as
> such there have been a large number of changes (see [1] and [2]). The
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202680
--- Comment #6 from Dmitry Afanasiev ---
Created attachment 160605
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=160605&action=edit
boot -v output
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202680
--- Comment #5 from Dmitry Afanasiev ---
Created attachment 160604
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=160604&action=edit
pciconf -lvbc output
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202667
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|freebsd-b...@freebsd.org|freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
--
You are
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202680
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|freebsd-b...@freebsd.org|freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
--
You are
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202691
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|freebsd-b...@freebsd.org|freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
--
You are
Notice to Appear,
This is to inform you to appear in the Court on the September 06 for your case
hearing.
You are kindly asked to prepare and bring the documents relating to the case to
Court on the specified date.
Note: If you do not come, the case will be heard in your absence.
The copy of Co
Hi, Adrian and Andriy!
One of the fundamental things that me and Lawrence want to bring to
FreeBSD 12 (probably won't be in time with 11), is the NIC TX exhaustion
notification to the stack, also named as "network stack backpressure".
The problem is that when NICs TX queue is full we start to
19 matches
Mail list logo