Re: a couple /etc/rc.firewall questions

2015-08-22 Thread Kevin Oberman
On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 8:00 PM, Ian Smith wrote: > On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 08:44:53 +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote: > > Don Lewis wrote > > in <201508222103.t7ml3gax000...@gw.catspoiler.org>: > > > > tr> The example /etc/rc.firewall has provisions to use either in-kernel > NAT > > tr> or natd for

Re: a couple /etc/rc.firewall questions

2015-08-22 Thread Ian Smith
On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 08:44:53 +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote: > Don Lewis wrote > in <201508222103.t7ml3gax000...@gw.catspoiler.org>: > > tr> The example /etc/rc.firewall has provisions to use either in-kernel NAT > tr> or natd for the open and client firewall types, but the simple filewall > tr

[Bug 202510] [CARP] advertisements sourced from CARP IP cause double MASTER situations

2015-08-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202510 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|freebsd-b...@freebsd.org|freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org -- You are

Re: a couple /etc/rc.firewall questions

2015-08-22 Thread Hiroki Sato
Don Lewis wrote in <201508222103.t7ml3gax000...@gw.catspoiler.org>: tr> The example /etc/rc.firewall has provisions to use either in-kernel NAT tr> or natd for the open and client firewall types, but the simple filewall tr> type only has code for natd. Is there any reason that in-kernel NAT tr

a couple /etc/rc.firewall questions

2015-08-22 Thread Don Lewis
The example /etc/rc.firewall has provisions to use either in-kernel NAT or natd for the open and client firewall types, but the simple filewall type only has code for natd. Is there any reason that in-kernel NAT could not be used with the simple firewall type? After allowing connections to select

[Bug 200379] SCTP stack is not FIB aware

2015-08-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200379 Michael Tuexen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|In Progress |Closed Resolution|---

Re: ix(intel) vs mlxen(mellanox) 10Gb performance

2015-08-22 Thread Rick Macklem
Daniel Braniss wrote: > > > On Aug 22, 2015, at 12:46 AM, Rick Macklem wrote: > > > > Yonghyeon PYUN wrote: > >> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 09:00:35AM -0400, Rick Macklem wrote: > >>> Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > On 08/19/15 09:42, Yonghyeon PYUN wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 09:00:52

Re: ix(intel) vs mlxen(mellanox) 10Gb performance

2015-08-22 Thread Daniel Braniss
> On Aug 22, 2015, at 12:46 AM, Rick Macklem wrote: > > Yonghyeon PYUN wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 09:00:35AM -0400, Rick Macklem wrote: >>> Hans Petter Selasky wrote: On 08/19/15 09:42, Yonghyeon PYUN wrote: > On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 09:00:52AM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: