Wow vxlans look awesome! I am definitely going to experiment with those next!
Thanks for the great suggestions though everyone, this thread gave me a lot
more to experiment with
> On Aug 13, 2015, at 7:39 PM, Mark Martinec
> wrote:
>
> 2015-08-14 00:40 James Lott wrote:
>> I am in the proces
James Lott wrote this message on Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 15:40 -0700:
> * Does anyone know of a method supported under FreeBSD (other than
> EtherIP) for tunneling ethernet over IP that they may be able to suggest
> I check out?
Another option would be ssh + Tunnel... ssh_config(5) for more info..
2015-08-14 00:40 James Lott wrote:
I am in the process of planning a build out of a L2 VPN, in which I'd
like to have my primary "switch" and DHCP server be a FreeBSD system.
I would like to join each new host to the VPN by establishing an IP
tunnel with the primary "switch" which transports ethe
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178782
Sean Bruno changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|In Progress |Closed
Resolution|---
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 1:40 AM, James Lott wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I am in the process of planning a build out of a L2 VPN, in which I'd like
> to have my primary "switch" and DHCP server be a FreeBSD system. I would
> like to join each new host to the VPN by establishing an IP tunnel with the
>
Hello list,
I am in the process of planning a build out of a L2 VPN, in which I'd
like to have my primary "switch" and DHCP server be a FreeBSD system. I
would like to join each new host to the VPN by establishing an IP tunnel
with the primary "switch" which transports ethernet frames over the
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178782
--- Comment #9 from Jeff Pieper ---
(In reply to Sean Bruno from comment #8)
10.2-RELEASE works too (ix-2.8.3).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
fre
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178782
--- Comment #8 from Sean Bruno ---
(In reply to Sean Bruno from comment #7)
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/ISO-IMAGES/10.2/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178782
--- Comment #7 from Sean Bruno ---
(In reply to Jeff Pieper from comment #6)
Thanks for testing this, it really saved me quite a bit of time in setup.
Do you have time to test 10.2R in the next week or so? I think its about to be
pushed o
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178782
--- Comment #6 from Jeff Pieper ---
10.1 (ixgbe-2.5.15) still fails (no link and no interrupts), however I also
tested a VM using an 11.0-CURRENT-amd64-20150804-r286285 snapshot, which has
ix-3.1.0 and it gets link and passes traffic.
Sin
Thanks, we'll try that as well. We have not got as much traffic in the past
2 days, so we were running at about 140Kpps, well below the level that used
to cause issues before. I'll try to redistribute traffic tomorrow so that
we get it tested.
-Max
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 11:47 PM, Adrian Chadd
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 10:10 PM, Adrian Chadd
wrote:
> I forget the details; I'd have to go dig through the commit history.
>
> Which wifi NIC is it?
>
>
> -a
>
It is a TP-Link TL-WN7200ND wireless USB adapter
# dmesg | grep run
run0: <1.0> on usbus0
run0: MAC/BBP RT3070 (rev 0x0201), RF RT30
I forget the details; I'd have to go dig through the commit history.
Which wifi NIC is it?
-a
On 13 August 2015 at 10:11, Hooshang F wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 10:04 PM, Adrian Chadd
> wrote:
>>
>> HI,
>>
>> Would you please try freebsd-head? I think this was fixed a while ago,
>> bu
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178782
Jeff Pieper changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jeffrey.e.pie...@intel.com
--- Comme
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 10:04 PM, Adrian Chadd
wrote:
> HI,
>
> Would you please try freebsd-head? I think this was fixed a while ago,
> but I don't think it was ever backported to freebsd-8.
>
> Thanks!
>
Unfortunately, it is not possible for us to change the OS right now.
I would appreciate if
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178782
--- Comment #4 from Sean Bruno ---
(In reply to legumen from comment #3)
ok, I'm hunting around for some linux folks that can test this and validate.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
__
16 matches
Mail list logo