Jim Thompson wrote this message on Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 23:18 -0500:
> > On Jul 27, 2015, at 10:41 PM, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> >
> > Jim Thompson wrote this message on Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 20:24 -0500:
> >>> On Jul 27, 2015, at 7:57 PM, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I would like to remo
> On Jul 27, 2015, at 10:41 PM, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
>
> Jim Thompson wrote this message on Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 20:24 -0500:
>>> On Jul 27, 2015, at 7:57 PM, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
>>>
>>> I would like to remove it from HEAD immediately as I don't see a use
>>> for it. Some time ago I pr
Jim Thompson wrote this message on Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 20:24 -0500:
> > On Jul 27, 2015, at 7:57 PM, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> >
> > I would like to remove it from HEAD immediately as I don't see a use
> > for it. Some time ago I proposed removing Skipjack from the OCF in 12, but
> > personall
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201916
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|freebsd-b...@freebsd.org|freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
--
You are
> On Jul 27, 2015, at 7:57 PM, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
>
> I would like to remove it from HEAD immediately as I don't see a use
> for it. Some time ago I proposed removing Skipjack from the OCF in 12, but
> personally, now that I think about how long 12 is, we deprecate these sooner
> rather
Upon doing some investigation, I have found that the SKIPJACK IPsec
encryption mode was never standardized. It was a draft[1] back in
1999, but never made into an offical RFC, and IANA nor IETF never
assigned an offical number for the mode.
Skipjack is also a very weak cipher[2]. The largest key
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Yeah thats pretty much what I’m doing right now. Attempting to match up some
interfaces and throw a valuable description on each interface. With vlan
interfaces I have not been successful at anything but manual configuration thus
far.
On Jul 27,
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 11:56 AM, Jason Hellenthal
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Matter of fact … could someone commit this ?
>
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=156675
>
>
> No clue why it was closed for something that is so simple to do.
>
>
I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Matter of fact … could someone commit this ?
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=156675
No clue why it was closed for something that is so simple to do.
On Jul 27, 2015, at 13:45, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
Signed PGP part
Looking f
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Jason Hellenthal
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Looking for the interest in adopting the descr and description ifconfig
> commands into the rc subsystem and curious how many would be interested in
> utilizing it.
>
> e.g. ifconfig_
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Looking for the interest in adopting the descr and description ifconfig
commands into the rc subsystem and curious how many would be interested in
utilizing it.
e.g. ifconfig_vlan3_description=‘BLAH BLAH BLAH”
- --
Jason Hellenthal
JJH48-ARIN
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200321
George V. Neville-Neil changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||g...@freebsd.org
12 matches
Mail list logo
